History of commissioners and presidents of banks and bales, of heroes and sappers. The spazzaturaè disappeared from the streets, the incinerator has opened its doors and the state is back. Full of joy. But the conflict that arose around the prosecutor and processes still in progress notes that there 'is still a problem to solve. It covers the old leadership Impregiloe not heroes sung by Berlusconi in Acerra, but still sees the birth of the incinerator on trial. It is a story that begins eleven years ago. And 1998 led to the region 'time by the center of Anthony Rakes working on a new cycle of waste disposal. In June, leaving the notice and tender documents' contract. And, as argued by the 'now famous report of Professor Paolo Rabitti, acts as guide to cha' entire subsequent investigation, that's where the trouble begins. The notice would have to follow a previous order issued by 'then Minister of' Inside Giorgio Napolitano. There are essentially asked to provide a collection of 35 percent, waste treatment, net of this 35 per cent, the recognition of incentives Cip6 up to a maximum of 50 per cent of 'total production of waste in the region. A set of requirements had just the 'objective of protecting the separation from the risk that prevailed instead' s interest to make the most money possible with the greatest possible amount of material burned. But the story now takes a 'other folk. Already the announcement provides facilities oversized compared to 50 percent of that roof, they are not asked Cdr requirements for the facilities, the score is set to reward the 'financial offer than the technical quality of the project. You went to the famous report also chronicles the Parliament. It is in the Committee 's investigation fact that the consultant Umberto Arena, Antonio Bassolino denied that referred to "reports" that he never knew "who c. ...' was, to report how Fisia the project (the 'then Impregilo group companies who participated in a race which had to be excluded immediately from the irregularity) was given a technical rating of only 4.2 points. A rejection, however, offset by much more intensive evaluation on the projected costs 83 pounds per kilo, and timing of implementation, 300 days. Weighed for costs: the rival group, led by Foster Wheeler, and that included the 'Enel, brought some 110 lire per kilo. The technical evaluation of Rabitti then say that those 83 pounds per kilo could be offered only knowing that it would be far more material burnt lawful. Here Rabitti discovers the 'act that acts as architrave to make any changes following the philosophy of the plan. Fact, it happens that October 12, 1998 's then Minister Edo Ronchi already rakes in the context of the notice inconsistencies. But the day after receiving a letter from the Rakes 'Abi: banks have to finance the project are aware that with that rate of differenziatai earnings are not sufficient facilities and therefore suggests, however, to charge the municipalities' s entire garbage produced, not only that given to energy plants: a means to push the municipalities do not spend any more money to waste. The banks also want to delete an 'other rules proposed by Napolitano: Cdr product pending the construction of' equipment shall not be disposed of elsewhere, but stored in the region until its use in 'system itself. It is an 'other move from light industrial flavor, which allows you to enjoy in the future Cip6 also on' energy with the material. Material which then increase over time. Want to impediments to the construction of 'plant, but also, as says Rabitti, because in the meantime also proposed Cdr unfit and produce more material to send to the oven and less compost and fos. The fact is that in October Rakes said the banks that will be tackled later, but in December he was raised by the "turnaround". Is setting up a center-left led by Andrea Losco. How Rastrelli, who was also appointed commissioner and will take you to the port project Fisia, giving the race in March 2000. Unless then leave in June to sign the new president Antonio Bassolino. So far storicotecnica the reconstruction of the disaster. With the 'assumption that the 6 million who have invaded ecoballe Campaniae the crises of garbage on the street are the result of an error in setting:' s have sacrificed in favor of separate economic sustainability of the industrial cycle of the incinerator, and probably even the Camorra, which in turn has profited in recent years on the ground of her favorite sites and landfills in the transport of the material that was accumulating. If all this has been an intentional plan to help right from 'start to the interests of "heroes" of Impregilo, this is precisely the' object of the process.
ROBERTO Di Fucci, La Repubblica, April 1, 2009
0 comments:
Post a Comment