dragon With the sound of thunder, the sky dragon winding furrows .
- Materials:
wood
mechanisms
embossed carton
- Size: 17x72x17cm
- Year: 2008
Sunday, December 20, 2009
How Do I Know If My Hairs Long Enough To Wax
dragon With the sound of thunder, the sky dragon winding furrows .
Alvarez Ad60scbk Price
the bride is no more! Where did the bride who once lived in the dress?
- Materials: paper and cloth
- Size: size 42
- Year: 2006
Polymyxin B And Sulfa Allergy
aerofilia A breath of fresh air !
- Materials:
paper
video projector
nylon
- Dimensions: variable
- Year: 2009
Japanese Molested Train Public
frameworks sensitive II Operate your senses and play with the mechanisms.
- Materials:
wood
mechanisms
origami paper
- Size: 15x15x15cm single module
- Year of creation: 2005
Which Club Soccer Team Has The Most Trophies
dressed sensitive There are no inanimate objects.
- Materials: fabric, paper, wood, electrical equipment, lens
- Size: size 42
- Year: 2008
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Online Land Surveying Degree
The critique of neoliberalism Noam Chomsky
"global economic crisis", this is one of the most common expressions that filled the front pages of newspapers and television news headlines over the past two years. Why? What happened?
There is a method of analysis that can easily show if the mechanisms detailed in this crisis, at least the general features and intrinsic properties of complex economic policy that appears to have collapsed all of a sudden?
Through the study of criticism of Noam Chomsky's response to contemporary neoliberalism is more plausible that the system was designed for this purpose, the analysis of American linguist, in fact, seems to be a tool that can give us a criterion for designing this framework, thanks to the description of a two-way relationship between politics and economics.
The starting point is, therefore, the critique of neoliberalism, the concept of the economy in recent decades. But what is meant by neo-liberalism?
The theoretical definition of this term is: a economic doctrine that supports the release by the state of the economy, privatization of public services, the liberalization of all non-strategic sector and the end of each Customs seal, in summary, the economic theory of the global market according to the analysis of economists has failed, as explained explicitly, Duccio Cavalieri, a professor of economics at the University of Florence
"In short, the crisis has highlighted the lack in the current capitalist system of effective self-regulating market. In this sense, we can certainly talk about the failure of neoliberalism .. "
But this economic system really works well? It really turns out to be independent of the state policies and based on true self-regulation of the market?
From here begins the study of Chomsky. In his view, in fact, the first step to understanding the economic chain is certainly a political structure in which it moves.
The author begins his discussion of the end of World War II, a real historical node to the current structure of international relations.
He describes to us the years that are defined in political science of the bipolar system, where the United States presented themselves as a global leader in power and wealth, with the hope to maintain that role and expand their economic system in what was called the " Grand Area ", that entire portion of the globe outside the Soviet bloc. How the United States wanted to impose his rule, Chomsky derives from a long memorandum remained secret, the Study of Planning Policy No. 23), written by George Kennan, head of programming of the State Department in 1948 . The summary of it is that, in order to maintain the superiority achieved, the strategies should favor a policy of power, free from sentimentality and ideologies such as the idea that the government was responsible for the welfare of the entire population, or human rights, because the only interest was to defend the U.S., that is, as Chomsky himself points out, the need American economy. He obtained, therefore, from these guidelines, the key for interpreting all the actions of U.S. military after World War II. For each area of \u200b\u200bthe "Grand Area", in fact, was given a role, and if one was inside it he refused to do it, the American intervention would be immediate, as the Vietnam War clearly demonstrated.
This first part of the analysis suggests, therefore, a first pole to put the definition of neoliberalism. If the world stage in these terms is subject to the state's political leaders, in fact, the concept of free market is a first concrete barrier.
analysis of Chomsky does not stop there however, but rather indicates another stage in history is essential to understand the current state of things, typically tied to financial reality. The year is 1971, when a major acceleration towards the contemporary neo-liberalism was caused by the Nixon administration's decision to dismantle the global economic system created by the Bretton Woods (1944), abolishing the convertibility of the dollar. Here's why:
"The Bretton Woods sought to control the flow of capital. After World War II, when the U.S. and Britain have created this system, there was a great desire for democracy. The system had to preserve the ideals of social democrats, essentially the welfare state. To do so requires controlling the movement of capital. If you let them go freely from one country to another, there comes a day when financial institutions are able to determine the policy of the States. Constitute what is called 'virtual parliament': without having a real existence, are able to influence the policy of the states with the threat to withdraw the funds and other financial manipulations. [] So all over the world, there is since a decline of public service, the stagnation or decline in wages, the deterioration of working conditions, increase in working hours. "
a result of these statements, the net result is looming political and economic as well: on the one hand, a unilateral policy imposed by the global leader in the rest of the planet, the other possibility for the flow of capital to move freely within this space. The drawing is not yet complete, but it is important to note at this point, an obvious but worthy of consideration to be explicit: who owns this capital free to move within the system? Obviously the big corporations, particularly American.
But why this free flow of capital, over the years has caused a steady impoverishment of the population, a reduction in wages and the decline of public service?
The explanation can be made through three evaluations.
Consider, first, the free movement of capital: this is the main factor that over the years has resulted in the steady decline in wages and the decline of their purchasing power. This is because the ability to move money without barriers has become one of the most powerful weapons of the firms to deploy against the demands of workers' associations to improve their wages or working conditions in general. The mere possibility that it could threaten to move production at will, or you move it to places where labor costs were much lower, progressively annihilated the demands of the working class, placed in a situation of growing insecurity.
The second question is: where do these huge capital that the power groups, investors, move at will and without asking too many questions? Chomsky responds and shows that the answer is "the State". You can define this as a crucial step in the analysis of his critique of neo-liberalism, because it explains two facts:
A) neoliberalism is pure theory, the real economy is profoundly influenced by the states;
B) multinational industries Americans have always grants or government funding, so while profits are private, the costs and risks imposed on the population.
To explain the first point, Chomsky points out how the two main international advocates of neoliberalism, the U.S. and Britain, particularly since the '80s, in the figures of the then president Ronald Reagan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, have always carried protectionist measures in large-scale defense of their domestic markets. By analyzing the budget of the Reagan administration published in the journal "Foreign Affairs", the author claims that "he was the director of the biggest turn toward protectionism never occurred since the thirties. "
In light of these considerations, and according to the analysis of international politics U.S. made earlier, we can say that if we can speak of neoliberalism, it must be defined unilaterally. The U.S. international action opens the way for investment of its large companies, requires the mode of governance and policies to assist them and at the same time, it protects from adverse consequences that the system imposed on them may cause a reflex .
addition to being protected from the outside, however, large corporations are also defended by the policy within their states. Indeed, the protectionist measures guarantee them the market on which products to flow back (besides the one created abroad), enjoy the legislation is that the guarantees often more rights than an individual (for example, consider the Maroni law in Italy) and get the money to be invested by government subsidies, made entirely contrary to the neo-liberal theory.
In this sense, then, Chomsky argues that the profits are private but the costs and risks are public, socialized.
The result of this analysis reveals three key features:
A) the progressive impoverishment of the population of powerful states, since they exert on military costs, loans to corporations and the gradual decline wages;
B) operation of the most underdeveloped areas of the planet, as a reservoir of resources, human and material, both for production and for the creation of new markets;
C) alliance "State-Capitalism" as a weapon defense.
If the picture was and now is, was it not fate that the global crisis, which now hits us, stealing upon our heads? Certainly, as stated by the Knights, this "neoliberalism" has failed. Noam Chomsky has
perhaps right when he says that the understanding of politics and economics is affordable for everyone, whether it unmasks the rhetoric that surrounds them and are told the facts for what they are?
Matteo De Laurentis 
"global economic crisis", this is one of the most common expressions that filled the front pages of newspapers and television news headlines over the past two years. Why? What happened?
There is a method of analysis that can easily show if the mechanisms detailed in this crisis, at least the general features and intrinsic properties of complex economic policy that appears to have collapsed all of a sudden?
Through the study of criticism of Noam Chomsky's response to contemporary neoliberalism is more plausible that the system was designed for this purpose, the analysis of American linguist, in fact, seems to be a tool that can give us a criterion for designing this framework, thanks to the description of a two-way relationship between politics and economics.
The starting point is, therefore, the critique of neoliberalism, the concept of the economy in recent decades. But what is meant by neo-liberalism?
The theoretical definition of this term is: a economic doctrine that supports the release by the state of the economy, privatization of public services, the liberalization of all non-strategic sector and the end of each Customs seal, in summary, the economic theory of the global market according to the analysis of economists has failed, as explained explicitly, Duccio Cavalieri, a professor of economics at the University of Florence
"In short, the crisis has highlighted the lack in the current capitalist system of effective self-regulating market. In this sense, we can certainly talk about the failure of neoliberalism .. "
But this economic system really works well? It really turns out to be independent of the state policies and based on true self-regulation of the market?
From here begins the study of Chomsky. In his view, in fact, the first step to understanding the economic chain is certainly a political structure in which it moves.
The author begins his discussion of the end of World War II, a real historical node to the current structure of international relations.
He describes to us the years that are defined in political science of the bipolar system, where the United States presented themselves as a global leader in power and wealth, with the hope to maintain that role and expand their economic system in what was called the " Grand Area ", that entire portion of the globe outside the Soviet bloc. How the United States wanted to impose his rule, Chomsky derives from a long memorandum remained secret, the Study of Planning Policy No. 23), written by George Kennan, head of programming of the State Department in 1948 . The summary of it is that, in order to maintain the superiority achieved, the strategies should favor a policy of power, free from sentimentality and ideologies such as the idea that the government was responsible for the welfare of the entire population, or human rights, because the only interest was to defend the U.S., that is, as Chomsky himself points out, the need American economy. He obtained, therefore, from these guidelines, the key for interpreting all the actions of U.S. military after World War II. For each area of \u200b\u200bthe "Grand Area", in fact, was given a role, and if one was inside it he refused to do it, the American intervention would be immediate, as the Vietnam War clearly demonstrated.
This first part of the analysis suggests, therefore, a first pole to put the definition of neoliberalism. If the world stage in these terms is subject to the state's political leaders, in fact, the concept of free market is a first concrete barrier.
analysis of Chomsky does not stop there however, but rather indicates another stage in history is essential to understand the current state of things, typically tied to financial reality. The year is 1971, when a major acceleration towards the contemporary neo-liberalism was caused by the Nixon administration's decision to dismantle the global economic system created by the Bretton Woods (1944), abolishing the convertibility of the dollar. Here's why:
"The Bretton Woods sought to control the flow of capital. After World War II, when the U.S. and Britain have created this system, there was a great desire for democracy. The system had to preserve the ideals of social democrats, essentially the welfare state. To do so requires controlling the movement of capital. If you let them go freely from one country to another, there comes a day when financial institutions are able to determine the policy of the States. Constitute what is called 'virtual parliament': without having a real existence, are able to influence the policy of the states with the threat to withdraw the funds and other financial manipulations. [] So all over the world, there is since a decline of public service, the stagnation or decline in wages, the deterioration of working conditions, increase in working hours. "
a result of these statements, the net result is looming political and economic as well: on the one hand, a unilateral policy imposed by the global leader in the rest of the planet, the other possibility for the flow of capital to move freely within this space. The drawing is not yet complete, but it is important to note at this point, an obvious but worthy of consideration to be explicit: who owns this capital free to move within the system? Obviously the big corporations, particularly American.
But why this free flow of capital, over the years has caused a steady impoverishment of the population, a reduction in wages and the decline of public service?
The explanation can be made through three evaluations.
Consider, first, the free movement of capital: this is the main factor that over the years has resulted in the steady decline in wages and the decline of their purchasing power. This is because the ability to move money without barriers has become one of the most powerful weapons of the firms to deploy against the demands of workers' associations to improve their wages or working conditions in general. The mere possibility that it could threaten to move production at will, or you move it to places where labor costs were much lower, progressively annihilated the demands of the working class, placed in a situation of growing insecurity.
The second question is: where do these huge capital that the power groups, investors, move at will and without asking too many questions? Chomsky responds and shows that the answer is "the State". You can define this as a crucial step in the analysis of his critique of neo-liberalism, because it explains two facts:
A) neoliberalism is pure theory, the real economy is profoundly influenced by the states;
B) multinational industries Americans have always grants or government funding, so while profits are private, the costs and risks imposed on the population.
To explain the first point, Chomsky points out how the two main international advocates of neoliberalism, the U.S. and Britain, particularly since the '80s, in the figures of the then president Ronald Reagan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, have always carried protectionist measures in large-scale defense of their domestic markets. By analyzing the budget of the Reagan administration published in the journal "Foreign Affairs", the author claims that "he was the director of the biggest turn toward protectionism never occurred since the thirties. "
In light of these considerations, and according to the analysis of international politics U.S. made earlier, we can say that if we can speak of neoliberalism, it must be defined unilaterally. The U.S. international action opens the way for investment of its large companies, requires the mode of governance and policies to assist them and at the same time, it protects from adverse consequences that the system imposed on them may cause a reflex .
addition to being protected from the outside, however, large corporations are also defended by the policy within their states. Indeed, the protectionist measures guarantee them the market on which products to flow back (besides the one created abroad), enjoy the legislation is that the guarantees often more rights than an individual (for example, consider the Maroni law in Italy) and get the money to be invested by government subsidies, made entirely contrary to the neo-liberal theory.
In this sense, then, Chomsky argues that the profits are private but the costs and risks are public, socialized.
The result of this analysis reveals three key features:
A) the progressive impoverishment of the population of powerful states, since they exert on military costs, loans to corporations and the gradual decline wages;
B) operation of the most underdeveloped areas of the planet, as a reservoir of resources, human and material, both for production and for the creation of new markets;
C) alliance "State-Capitalism" as a weapon defense.
If the picture was and now is, was it not fate that the global crisis, which now hits us, stealing upon our heads? Certainly, as stated by the Knights, this "neoliberalism" has failed. Noam Chomsky has
perhaps right when he says that the understanding of politics and economics is affordable for everyone, whether it unmasks the rhetoric that surrounds them and are told the facts for what they are?
Matteo De Laurentis
Monday, December 7, 2009
Desactivar Veriface En Win 7
Law
Born Twenty years after the October Revolution the Soviet legal system was modeled in the definition of social rights of citizenship in the countries of Western capitalism
In December 1887, after a few months of attendance, a young student petit bourgeois origins, he was expelled from the Faculty of Law, University of Kazan in imperial Russia. Attended anti-tsarist circles. The things had gone better than his brother who was executed just before an attack to the Tsar. The young man, Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov, was a particular type. He applied for readmission in Kazan, but his application was rejected. He applied to go abroad to study, but this does not was accepted. Finally he managed to enroll as "external student" ie without the right frequency, the University of St. Petersburg. In 1891, the young Ulyanov came to support the bar exam. He received the highest rating in all subjects: the only candidate of his year to achieve that excellence. Despite the brilliant start, Ulyanov was not destined for a bright legal career.
Less than a generation after proving the right to know Tsarist Best of all, Ulyanov, now known as Lenin, did away entirely with the stroke of a pen. Began, surrounded by unspeakable difficulties, a route in creating a new legal order, the impact of global continued until twenty years ago, allowing the Western legal world to reach the zenith of its civilization.
The Soviet legality
I do not think there is an aspiring lawyer (or notary or judge) that during the preparation of its investigation, not hate the object of his study to the point of need, even for a moment, its abolition. Nor do I believe there is a better description of the attitude of a revolutionary than the right of that found in Voltaire: "You want good laws? Throw everything you have and create the new. " Not many know however that this widespread yearning (we find it as such in the rhetoric of the early years of American Revolution mocked by Grant Gilmore) was satisfied by the Bolsheviks in a more advanced and constructive than it has ever been able to anyone else. An experiment in building a new legality that has never had parties for the entire twentieth century.
I think it serves a need for historical truth, the very time when we are surrounded by mediocre literature celebrating the 1989 revolution that check just happens to coincide with its copious straparlare the end of the crisis, to retrace over very brief , the contribution of the global legal order by seventy years of development of socialist legality. This is not just to finish the triptych of legal expertise 'Other' published on these pages (The manifesto of 30 September and 15 November), but also to overcome an image of socialist legality which still, twenty years after the end of the Cold War, suffers the most vulgar propaganda Atlanticist. In fact, during the Cold War writers like Hayek, Rostow, or Roscoe Pound and then countless singers in the wake of Fukuyama have built a fetish of law in opposition to the West '(the) socialist legality.
processes to Lubyanka
The construction of a dominant western law does not pass only through the "lack" of law in the contemporary from China to the Islamic world, but is based mainly in the refusal to acknowledge the contribution of socialism made to our own legal experience, then through a denial of historical experience made not only in the Soviet Union but also by us in the past. Speaking in 1990, Bush declared that "with the Soviet Union finally disappeared," the U.S. would "build a world where the rules of law would replace the law of the jungle, a world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice, a world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. "
is now finally justice to this idea of socialist legality as the "law of the jungle 'accompanied by gruesome images of summary trials conducted at the Lubyanka, or on the periphery of the African Negus red during the terror of the Derg. Clearly, you walk along a road is not easy because what interests us is really made to restore the contribution of socialism (with Stalinism and everything else) to international legality and the contribution of the socialist civilization, which is so easier and granted at least interesting. In fact it is not enough to try on the tragic controversy of the thirties that cost the lives of Evgeny Pashukanis, author of a key The General Theory of Law and Marxism, fell in disgrace following the controversy with the Grand Inquisitor Andrey Vishinsky, needed or not the disappearance of the right (and thus his or her role and that of the State) in the transition between socialism and communism.
I want to show how the legal ideas of Lenin have led to a rewriting incredibilmnte advanced new law, by enacting laws designed finally to the liberation and oppression. It seems to me that this right is mirrored in forced capitalism to profoundly transform its legal institutions of economic exploitation in the direction of more inclusive and respectful of the person. It is obvious that the different narrative that I intend to share the analysis and evaluation of Angelo d'Orsi the consequences of the fall of the Berlin Wall on the legal culture, which forces us today to a huge reconstruction effort because capitalism has no more incentive to show a face of international civil aviation.
A constitution to be studied
Bolshevik legislation since 1917 began to bear the conditions of the Soviet population. Lenin dreamed of a system based on the right to a roof over your head, free medical care and a job. No government in history had never before taken charge of such social responsibilities. Before the twenties, when industrialization was still far away, the law guarantees the job in a historic moment when the West the owner could fire the employee at any time. The Soviet workers were entitled to medical insurance at the expense of the employer, a benefit for incapacity to work, significant periods of rest paid during illness. The working day was given a limit of eight hours to six days a week (reduced to 7 in 1928) while still in the United States was unconstitutional law to limit working hours for children. He was retired from the strenuous work in 50 years, and set up schools for lifelong learning, free, in which workers were able to deliver securities and higher education. He was born on those first few years of work and collective bargaining were established forms of industrial democracy. A sustained program of nationalizations made this right effective, especially for use. During the crisis of '29 when unemployment reached astonishing figures in the West, the Soviet economy boasted high employment levels.
The women were given a level of legal protection that was achieved elsewhere, when reached, half a century later. For example, single mothers with dependent children was granted preferential treatment, job close to home, nursery schools and free support. All such rights, including equal pay between the genders, were constitutionalized for the first time since Stalin in '36. Already in '17 they tried to make the right wing of the house by moratorium rents and, shortly thereafter, rent control. The industry had to offer home workers. Since 1921 houses nationalized the employee does not have to pay rent or expenses. Impressonanti public building programs solved, albeit in an unsatisfactory manner, the housing problem already with the industrialization of the thirties.
The discontent of the fourth state
The progress of the legislation were equally significant in other western areas: the equality between spouses, divorce and abortion, without restrictions already introduced in 1917. The women had the right to time off for maternity keeping their jobs. As early as 1918 over half a century before Italy in the children born out of wedlock were seen the same rights of legitimate children. In criminal law Lenin strove to give effect to the principle of rieducazone due to the concept of crime as a product of social conditions. The sentences were reduced radicalmete, replaced by the prison re-education camps where they could learn a job. The euthanasia was decriminalized sodomy, and so since 1920. Important programs, learn to protect the rights of sex workers, were established to solve the problem of prostitution. In international law, the Soviet government denounced the practice of secret treaties concluded by the Tsar pubbici over 100 against the most various peoples. In 1919, the Bolshevik government renounced all its privileges including international and extraterritoriality enjoyed by capitulations in Persia, China, Afghanistan and Turkey.
This set of national laws in a panic threw the Western governments dealing with the discontent of the fourth state. The answer to this situation engenders a transformation that seemed definitive legal in Italy when still in the early eighties, I attended the Law Faculty as a student (staff workers, rent control, Law on the house). Immediately after the conference of Versailles after World War I, was born the ILO (International Labour Organization) and the Soviet model inspired the social aspects of Constitutions of the Second World War, as well as areas that now seem more utopian of the Charter of the United Nations and the European Convention on Human Rights. Soviet legislation led the transformation in the Western conception of international law (including decolonization), family law, criminal law, contract law, property and even that of racial desegregation in the United States. In the West the capitalist relationship between private law and public law in favor of the latter came out shocked. With the Berlin Wall and the purging of the jurists who followed the unification of East Germany, fell not only an ideal but the yearning all'incusione through the social right that survived the German Democratic Republic.
without external incentives, in the name of flexibility, efficiency and market we are back to authoritarianism bigoted bosses of the mines that export under the heading democracy.
Ugo Mattei, "the manifesto," December 5, 2009 
Born Twenty years after the October Revolution the Soviet legal system was modeled in the definition of social rights of citizenship in the countries of Western capitalism
In December 1887, after a few months of attendance, a young student petit bourgeois origins, he was expelled from the Faculty of Law, University of Kazan in imperial Russia. Attended anti-tsarist circles. The things had gone better than his brother who was executed just before an attack to the Tsar. The young man, Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov, was a particular type. He applied for readmission in Kazan, but his application was rejected. He applied to go abroad to study, but this does not was accepted. Finally he managed to enroll as "external student" ie without the right frequency, the University of St. Petersburg. In 1891, the young Ulyanov came to support the bar exam. He received the highest rating in all subjects: the only candidate of his year to achieve that excellence. Despite the brilliant start, Ulyanov was not destined for a bright legal career.
Less than a generation after proving the right to know Tsarist Best of all, Ulyanov, now known as Lenin, did away entirely with the stroke of a pen. Began, surrounded by unspeakable difficulties, a route in creating a new legal order, the impact of global continued until twenty years ago, allowing the Western legal world to reach the zenith of its civilization.
The Soviet legality
I do not think there is an aspiring lawyer (or notary or judge) that during the preparation of its investigation, not hate the object of his study to the point of need, even for a moment, its abolition. Nor do I believe there is a better description of the attitude of a revolutionary than the right of that found in Voltaire: "You want good laws? Throw everything you have and create the new. " Not many know however that this widespread yearning (we find it as such in the rhetoric of the early years of American Revolution mocked by Grant Gilmore) was satisfied by the Bolsheviks in a more advanced and constructive than it has ever been able to anyone else. An experiment in building a new legality that has never had parties for the entire twentieth century.
I think it serves a need for historical truth, the very time when we are surrounded by mediocre literature celebrating the 1989 revolution that check just happens to coincide with its copious straparlare the end of the crisis, to retrace over very brief , the contribution of the global legal order by seventy years of development of socialist legality. This is not just to finish the triptych of legal expertise 'Other' published on these pages (The manifesto of 30 September and 15 November), but also to overcome an image of socialist legality which still, twenty years after the end of the Cold War, suffers the most vulgar propaganda Atlanticist. In fact, during the Cold War writers like Hayek, Rostow, or Roscoe Pound and then countless singers in the wake of Fukuyama have built a fetish of law in opposition to the West '(the) socialist legality.
processes to Lubyanka
The construction of a dominant western law does not pass only through the "lack" of law in the contemporary from China to the Islamic world, but is based mainly in the refusal to acknowledge the contribution of socialism made to our own legal experience, then through a denial of historical experience made not only in the Soviet Union but also by us in the past. Speaking in 1990, Bush declared that "with the Soviet Union finally disappeared," the U.S. would "build a world where the rules of law would replace the law of the jungle, a world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice, a world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. "
is now finally justice to this idea of socialist legality as the "law of the jungle 'accompanied by gruesome images of summary trials conducted at the Lubyanka, or on the periphery of the African Negus red during the terror of the Derg. Clearly, you walk along a road is not easy because what interests us is really made to restore the contribution of socialism (with Stalinism and everything else) to international legality and the contribution of the socialist civilization, which is so easier and granted at least interesting. In fact it is not enough to try on the tragic controversy of the thirties that cost the lives of Evgeny Pashukanis, author of a key The General Theory of Law and Marxism, fell in disgrace following the controversy with the Grand Inquisitor Andrey Vishinsky, needed or not the disappearance of the right (and thus his or her role and that of the State) in the transition between socialism and communism.
I want to show how the legal ideas of Lenin have led to a rewriting incredibilmnte advanced new law, by enacting laws designed finally to the liberation and oppression. It seems to me that this right is mirrored in forced capitalism to profoundly transform its legal institutions of economic exploitation in the direction of more inclusive and respectful of the person. It is obvious that the different narrative that I intend to share the analysis and evaluation of Angelo d'Orsi the consequences of the fall of the Berlin Wall on the legal culture, which forces us today to a huge reconstruction effort because capitalism has no more incentive to show a face of international civil aviation.
A constitution to be studied
Bolshevik legislation since 1917 began to bear the conditions of the Soviet population. Lenin dreamed of a system based on the right to a roof over your head, free medical care and a job. No government in history had never before taken charge of such social responsibilities. Before the twenties, when industrialization was still far away, the law guarantees the job in a historic moment when the West the owner could fire the employee at any time. The Soviet workers were entitled to medical insurance at the expense of the employer, a benefit for incapacity to work, significant periods of rest paid during illness. The working day was given a limit of eight hours to six days a week (reduced to 7 in 1928) while still in the United States was unconstitutional law to limit working hours for children. He was retired from the strenuous work in 50 years, and set up schools for lifelong learning, free, in which workers were able to deliver securities and higher education. He was born on those first few years of work and collective bargaining were established forms of industrial democracy. A sustained program of nationalizations made this right effective, especially for use. During the crisis of '29 when unemployment reached astonishing figures in the West, the Soviet economy boasted high employment levels.
The women were given a level of legal protection that was achieved elsewhere, when reached, half a century later. For example, single mothers with dependent children was granted preferential treatment, job close to home, nursery schools and free support. All such rights, including equal pay between the genders, were constitutionalized for the first time since Stalin in '36. Already in '17 they tried to make the right wing of the house by moratorium rents and, shortly thereafter, rent control. The industry had to offer home workers. Since 1921 houses nationalized the employee does not have to pay rent or expenses. Impressonanti public building programs solved, albeit in an unsatisfactory manner, the housing problem already with the industrialization of the thirties.
The discontent of the fourth state
The progress of the legislation were equally significant in other western areas: the equality between spouses, divorce and abortion, without restrictions already introduced in 1917. The women had the right to time off for maternity keeping their jobs. As early as 1918 over half a century before Italy in the children born out of wedlock were seen the same rights of legitimate children. In criminal law Lenin strove to give effect to the principle of rieducazone due to the concept of crime as a product of social conditions. The sentences were reduced radicalmete, replaced by the prison re-education camps where they could learn a job. The euthanasia was decriminalized sodomy, and so since 1920. Important programs, learn to protect the rights of sex workers, were established to solve the problem of prostitution. In international law, the Soviet government denounced the practice of secret treaties concluded by the Tsar pubbici over 100 against the most various peoples. In 1919, the Bolshevik government renounced all its privileges including international and extraterritoriality enjoyed by capitulations in Persia, China, Afghanistan and Turkey.
This set of national laws in a panic threw the Western governments dealing with the discontent of the fourth state. The answer to this situation engenders a transformation that seemed definitive legal in Italy when still in the early eighties, I attended the Law Faculty as a student (staff workers, rent control, Law on the house). Immediately after the conference of Versailles after World War I, was born the ILO (International Labour Organization) and the Soviet model inspired the social aspects of Constitutions of the Second World War, as well as areas that now seem more utopian of the Charter of the United Nations and the European Convention on Human Rights. Soviet legislation led the transformation in the Western conception of international law (including decolonization), family law, criminal law, contract law, property and even that of racial desegregation in the United States. In the West the capitalist relationship between private law and public law in favor of the latter came out shocked. With the Berlin Wall and the purging of the jurists who followed the unification of East Germany, fell not only an ideal but the yearning all'incusione through the social right that survived the German Democratic Republic.
without external incentives, in the name of flexibility, efficiency and market we are back to authoritarianism bigoted bosses of the mines that export under the heading democracy.
Ugo Mattei, "the manifesto," December 5, 2009
Reference Letter For Beauty Theraphist Example
Eastern A world of blood and tears
is difficult to understand how the planet will be able to find a way out of the current recession. The widening of the conflict for control of resources, however, prepare a little rosy future, making the laughable image of the market as a wonderland of the crisis is systemic, because it invests its financial aspects, social and cultural . It should be understood that Labors and banks are now the backbone of the real economy.
Capitalism is facing a systemic crisis, involving both the financial dimension to the 'real'. Giacomo Becattini the point from which to understand the consequences and the "side effects" of the current economic situation. A scholar of industrial districts as a model of economic development parallel to that based on the large enterprise, Becattini argues that the crisis exposes the limitations and difficulties of the left in the understanding of economic processes. At the same time, in this third round on how some Italian economists reflect on the current situation, calls not to make predictions about the easy ways out of the crisis, as dependent on "systemic logic" of its economic process by which national and international policies.
The fundamental questions to which economists seeking an answer can be summarized thus: what is the nature of this crisis is a crisis in financial or real, cyclical or systemic? It makes sense to compare with the crisis of '29?
The first crisis is systemic, because it involves the whole social organism, not only in its economic and financial, but also in social and cultural rights. It is financial and real at the same time, because the finance (the stock exchange, banks, etc. ..) in advanced capitalism, is the backbone - structurally infected - the real economy. Cyclic Finally, the nature of the market, closing the accounts ex post always systematically derailed from the path of development must be balanced and brought back, sooner or later the crisis.
As he played, in their inability to assess the likelihood of the crisis, the predilection of economists 'mainstream' for the formalization of mathematics at the expense of knowledge of the history of economic analysis - and history in general?
Without denying any benefit to modeling politically uncommitted rampant in the world of economic studies, I think, in essence, that this guidance contains a waiver of the main task of the economist, which for me is to analyze the functioning of economic systems as a whole, including the 'market economy', not simply as a means of maximizing economic welfare, but also the activation and development of intellectual potential of every people of every social stratum. The "great waste" of current capitalism, not offset by any increase in the gross domestic product, is its inability to enhance the intellectual potential of a few billion humans. Other than low wages or unemployment in the world "civilized", that is the true and fundamental failure market.
authoritative commentators have long pointed out that the free movement of capital and bustling (the result of liberalization and deregulation of finance) mini bases of economic democracy, that democracy itself. Believes that the role of politics today, would only be that of market regulator or should go further?
Good question! To which, however, does not know the answer but we are in trouble and did not come out easily. Nor do I see around convincing answers. As the contribution that economists can and should give you an honest and intelligent criticism, but more and more depth of oligopolistic capitalism-financial that is leading us, I suspect, the apocalypse. The point seems to be that there is no longer a separate policy from the economy. I remember the story of ED Domar in which the Minister of Commerce presents a tray on all projects of the administration, calling on every industry representative to take away what's more annoying. Well, at the end of the round, the tray is empty. A current example of the story we have, more or less the story of Obama's health plan.
Many believe that the solution of the crisis can not be that Washington-Beijing axis. It is conceivable that the European model of social status, even if one can speak a European model, may be a reference for alternative economic policies as the "Washington Consensus", as the Chinese state capitalism? Or is there a risk that the future economic-political world in Europe (with the South) is confined to a marginal position?
The world order of even the relatively near future - say 10 years - is a great unknown. Outbreaks huge, positive and negative, as the economic awakening of China and India and "turmoil", South American and African, yet not widely tested, are at work and nobody can say what will happen in Europe if the upheaval will resist. Certainly, on the one hand the dividing lines drawn European history, are clear and deep and, consequently, the pressure antiunitarie are numerous and vigorous, the other the philosophy of a united Europe is dismally economistic. Behind this Europe, I can not see, at least so far, an idea-force of true overcome national egoism and construction of a new world player in the future. I only defensive, not without interest, of course, but that does not draw any specifically European future. In short: I, I hope the cable.
The current increase in public expenditure does not affect social spending (education, health, pensions and unemployment benefits), but the rescue of banks, finance companies and large groups. What happens, however, squeezing the earnings (real wages and pensions): an intervention on the supply side rather than demand is the right strategy to overcome the crisis, returning to acceptable levels of unemployment?
Right here is the cunning of maneuver. The '29 has taught that the main amplifier of the crisis, once started, is in a panic of depositors and stakeholders on the stock exchange. So the first steps were to ensure depositors and liquidity. Of course, this practice, once metabolized by the system, reduces the fear of failure and its financial consequences, in the boards of banks and corporations, and the traders, generating, therefore, a "mongrel capitalism" which is simply a matter, by any means, your business size in socially relevant (and Fiar Alitalia docent), to be guaranteed against failure. In summary, it was one that violated DH Robertson called the "golden rule of capitalism: who decides pays errors and cheating (if they are disclosed or if they can not do) - maybe with the prison (and here the Americans teach us something) but, certainly, with its heritage. And yet. This is precisely the bad habit that denounced softly Ernesto Cuccia - that capitalism knew him well - in his famous note of 1978: "you can not do without to wonder whether, if it were not facilitated the abundant flow of subsidized loans to certain employers - both private and public - not the illusion that the goodness of investment and the prudence of the management would have ensured the success of the initiative, but security policy as a means to reach the gigantism of business, and gigantism, no one knows how or why, their luck (now you understand!) is questionable, we said, though in this case we would not have companies much smaller, but more healthy, with growth at least partly based on self and not only on debt, production capacity closer to the actual size of the markets and, above all, less political interference, legal and illegal, in the economic life of the country. "
capitalism, in short, what awaits us, from 'Alice in Wonderland. " The real problem, whose solution is judged sub speciae aeternitatis the system is not full employment whatever, but "as occupation." The economic system is best for me, the one that opens to the maximum number of young working age, a number of alternative employment. A situation that presented itself - in a rudimentary way, of course! - In those microcosms of competitive capitalism, which are our industrial districts. But the Italian left, trapped in patterns of the past - sorry say - did not notice - regularly paying the penalty in electoral terms. How sad.
This implies immense responsibilities of the system. To ensure this plurality of possibilities for all young people need reforms that affect the living flesh of society. The trend towards equality of starting points, the age at which one enters into social life (16-18 years), with all that implies, is, for me, the idea of \u200b\u200ba new left force. And if this becomes the fundamental commitment of those who govern the country, it follows a list of measures of economic, social and educational quite different from those in circulation.
What is the price that future generations will have to endure in the face of form and size of debt that governments have used today in an effort not to wreck the world economy?
NB: If we refer to the developed world today, certainly a high price, which again proves "that the eave and tears of blood that 'capitalist development, but probably not higher than that of more traditional routes of escape from crisis. If you refer to, instead, to the world as a whole, you can do many hypotheses, but as far as I know, you do not have models that allow a logical answer is not far-fetched.
What we can say with certainty is that the current crisis will certainly lead to the collapse of capitalism, but because we have no safe alternative to radical operation, and a social system can not disappear until the successor is ready. The so-called "socialism with Chinese 'and the other roads to socialism claims are, in fact, for now, a great unknown.
But the accentuation of the contrasts for the control of natural resources and incarognimento humanity, which carry relentless, do not promise anything good. I'm sorry to close in negative, but this is, unfortunately, the belief that pervades my mood.
Cosma Orsi, "the manifesto," November 25, 2009 
is difficult to understand how the planet will be able to find a way out of the current recession. The widening of the conflict for control of resources, however, prepare a little rosy future, making the laughable image of the market as a wonderland of the crisis is systemic, because it invests its financial aspects, social and cultural . It should be understood that Labors and banks are now the backbone of the real economy.
Capitalism is facing a systemic crisis, involving both the financial dimension to the 'real'. Giacomo Becattini the point from which to understand the consequences and the "side effects" of the current economic situation. A scholar of industrial districts as a model of economic development parallel to that based on the large enterprise, Becattini argues that the crisis exposes the limitations and difficulties of the left in the understanding of economic processes. At the same time, in this third round on how some Italian economists reflect on the current situation, calls not to make predictions about the easy ways out of the crisis, as dependent on "systemic logic" of its economic process by which national and international policies.
The fundamental questions to which economists seeking an answer can be summarized thus: what is the nature of this crisis is a crisis in financial or real, cyclical or systemic? It makes sense to compare with the crisis of '29?
The first crisis is systemic, because it involves the whole social organism, not only in its economic and financial, but also in social and cultural rights. It is financial and real at the same time, because the finance (the stock exchange, banks, etc. ..) in advanced capitalism, is the backbone - structurally infected - the real economy. Cyclic Finally, the nature of the market, closing the accounts ex post always systematically derailed from the path of development must be balanced and brought back, sooner or later the crisis.
As he played, in their inability to assess the likelihood of the crisis, the predilection of economists 'mainstream' for the formalization of mathematics at the expense of knowledge of the history of economic analysis - and history in general?
Without denying any benefit to modeling politically uncommitted rampant in the world of economic studies, I think, in essence, that this guidance contains a waiver of the main task of the economist, which for me is to analyze the functioning of economic systems as a whole, including the 'market economy', not simply as a means of maximizing economic welfare, but also the activation and development of intellectual potential of every people of every social stratum. The "great waste" of current capitalism, not offset by any increase in the gross domestic product, is its inability to enhance the intellectual potential of a few billion humans. Other than low wages or unemployment in the world "civilized", that is the true and fundamental failure market.
authoritative commentators have long pointed out that the free movement of capital and bustling (the result of liberalization and deregulation of finance) mini bases of economic democracy, that democracy itself. Believes that the role of politics today, would only be that of market regulator or should go further?
Good question! To which, however, does not know the answer but we are in trouble and did not come out easily. Nor do I see around convincing answers. As the contribution that economists can and should give you an honest and intelligent criticism, but more and more depth of oligopolistic capitalism-financial that is leading us, I suspect, the apocalypse. The point seems to be that there is no longer a separate policy from the economy. I remember the story of ED Domar in which the Minister of Commerce presents a tray on all projects of the administration, calling on every industry representative to take away what's more annoying. Well, at the end of the round, the tray is empty. A current example of the story we have, more or less the story of Obama's health plan.
Many believe that the solution of the crisis can not be that Washington-Beijing axis. It is conceivable that the European model of social status, even if one can speak a European model, may be a reference for alternative economic policies as the "Washington Consensus", as the Chinese state capitalism? Or is there a risk that the future economic-political world in Europe (with the South) is confined to a marginal position?
The world order of even the relatively near future - say 10 years - is a great unknown. Outbreaks huge, positive and negative, as the economic awakening of China and India and "turmoil", South American and African, yet not widely tested, are at work and nobody can say what will happen in Europe if the upheaval will resist. Certainly, on the one hand the dividing lines drawn European history, are clear and deep and, consequently, the pressure antiunitarie are numerous and vigorous, the other the philosophy of a united Europe is dismally economistic. Behind this Europe, I can not see, at least so far, an idea-force of true overcome national egoism and construction of a new world player in the future. I only defensive, not without interest, of course, but that does not draw any specifically European future. In short: I, I hope the cable.
The current increase in public expenditure does not affect social spending (education, health, pensions and unemployment benefits), but the rescue of banks, finance companies and large groups. What happens, however, squeezing the earnings (real wages and pensions): an intervention on the supply side rather than demand is the right strategy to overcome the crisis, returning to acceptable levels of unemployment?
Right here is the cunning of maneuver. The '29 has taught that the main amplifier of the crisis, once started, is in a panic of depositors and stakeholders on the stock exchange. So the first steps were to ensure depositors and liquidity. Of course, this practice, once metabolized by the system, reduces the fear of failure and its financial consequences, in the boards of banks and corporations, and the traders, generating, therefore, a "mongrel capitalism" which is simply a matter, by any means, your business size in socially relevant (and Fiar Alitalia docent), to be guaranteed against failure. In summary, it was one that violated DH Robertson called the "golden rule of capitalism: who decides pays errors and cheating (if they are disclosed or if they can not do) - maybe with the prison (and here the Americans teach us something) but, certainly, with its heritage. And yet. This is precisely the bad habit that denounced softly Ernesto Cuccia - that capitalism knew him well - in his famous note of 1978: "you can not do without to wonder whether, if it were not facilitated the abundant flow of subsidized loans to certain employers - both private and public - not the illusion that the goodness of investment and the prudence of the management would have ensured the success of the initiative, but security policy as a means to reach the gigantism of business, and gigantism, no one knows how or why, their luck (now you understand!) is questionable, we said, though in this case we would not have companies much smaller, but more healthy, with growth at least partly based on self and not only on debt, production capacity closer to the actual size of the markets and, above all, less political interference, legal and illegal, in the economic life of the country. "
capitalism, in short, what awaits us, from 'Alice in Wonderland. " The real problem, whose solution is judged sub speciae aeternitatis the system is not full employment whatever, but "as occupation." The economic system is best for me, the one that opens to the maximum number of young working age, a number of alternative employment. A situation that presented itself - in a rudimentary way, of course! - In those microcosms of competitive capitalism, which are our industrial districts. But the Italian left, trapped in patterns of the past - sorry say - did not notice - regularly paying the penalty in electoral terms. How sad.
This implies immense responsibilities of the system. To ensure this plurality of possibilities for all young people need reforms that affect the living flesh of society. The trend towards equality of starting points, the age at which one enters into social life (16-18 years), with all that implies, is, for me, the idea of \u200b\u200ba new left force. And if this becomes the fundamental commitment of those who govern the country, it follows a list of measures of economic, social and educational quite different from those in circulation.
What is the price that future generations will have to endure in the face of form and size of debt that governments have used today in an effort not to wreck the world economy?
NB: If we refer to the developed world today, certainly a high price, which again proves "that the eave and tears of blood that 'capitalist development, but probably not higher than that of more traditional routes of escape from crisis. If you refer to, instead, to the world as a whole, you can do many hypotheses, but as far as I know, you do not have models that allow a logical answer is not far-fetched.
What we can say with certainty is that the current crisis will certainly lead to the collapse of capitalism, but because we have no safe alternative to radical operation, and a social system can not disappear until the successor is ready. The so-called "socialism with Chinese 'and the other roads to socialism claims are, in fact, for now, a great unknown.
But the accentuation of the contrasts for the control of natural resources and incarognimento humanity, which carry relentless, do not promise anything good. I'm sorry to close in negative, but this is, unfortunately, the belief that pervades my mood.
Cosma Orsi, "the manifesto," November 25, 2009
Inflamation On Cervix
The European left without ideas or projects
European socialism is undergoing a profound crisis. If we leave aside the Scandinavian social democracies of the landscape is where the social conlittualità is less acute, and infants socialist parties of Eastern Europe, we can see that in other cases - France, Britain, Germany, Italy - live the socialist parties a period of great diicoltà. The only exception is Spain. In France, the crisis began in 2000 with the failure of the "plural left". Policies for economic recovery in 1997 was followed by a more liberal since 1999. Lionel Jospin, the Socialist leader and then prime minister, was the symbol of this change in course. When the increase of abstention multinational election. In Britain, the symbol of the failure of New Labour has been the disappearance of its founder, Tony Blair. On balance, the much celebrated third way was not merely a repetition, the more watered down and winking of Thatcherism, based on the dismantling of public services and privatization. Today the Labour Party is in free fall. During the last Congress leader Gordon Brown has proposed an alternative welfare state, based on a "new economic, social and political" and "market regulation". But he has speciicato where resources should go to inanza his project and has not clarified how it intends to convince the middle classes, who want more social welfare and lower taxes at the same time. Britain is not part of the euro zone and therefore has more freedom in managing public debt and deicit budget, which reached respectively 80 and 12.4 percent of GDP. But the number of unemployed, who are already three million, is expected to grow: Iscala without incentives and without further increases in public spending seems impossible to save the jobs. From Rome to Berlin In Italy the Socialist Left has collapsed in the nineties and was sucked into a black hole. The birth of the PD, with the alliance between former Communists and the Christian Democrats, has had two negative consequences: the death of socialism, understood as the ideological and political project, and the creation of a large basin for the election of reactionary populism Silvio Berlusconi. The current crisis in the Berlusconi benefit more than the left is exposing its weakness. In Germany the Social Democratic Party (SPD) has been in crisis since 2000, when one of its leaders, Oskar Lafontaine, riiutò to support the liberal turn of Gerhard Schröder. In 2005, the SPD has lost the elections and agreed to form a coalition government with the Christian Democrats International
823 November 27, 2009 19 (CDU). Get used to weave alliances with Right, the Social Democrats have not been able to offer credible solutions to the crisis and today are the party of the European left in greater diicoltà. In addition to the split be desired by Lafontaine, founder of the leftist party Die Linke, since 1998 the SPD has lost about ten million votes, even in favor of Green, Liberal and Christian Democrat, and the recent election to the presidency of Sigmar Gabriel, without a centrist ideological proilo Dein, suiciente does not seem to change things. This brief overview of a new welfare system allows us to identify some trends. First of all the Western socialist parties in the nineties have agreed to adapt to globalization, choosing the so-called third way: not oferta just do not have an alternative plan to their traditional constituency (the middle classes and popular), but do not even understand all the consequences of their choice. In this way have become more aidabili from the standpoint of government, but have lost much of their identity. Hence the current paradox: the socialist parties are overwhelmed by the crisis of liberalism, while the liberal right not hesitate to apply the traditional recipes for the welfare Afront recession. In other words, the right is proving to be more pragmatic of the left, abandoned socialist ideas, he blindly aidata the virtues of social liberalism. In Western Europe, moreover, the left-wing forces are incapable of react to the shift to the right of society, a phenomenon that is the result of the instability created by the deregulation of economic and social development of recent years and that translates into strong demand for security (social, economic and identity) and a return to nationalism. These two underlying trends are present everywhere in Europe, lay bare the serious identity crisis of social democracy, which no longer has a project speciico. In the past 15 years, the victory of liberalism was not only economic, has been largely ideological and cultural. The left does not seem to have more tools, methods, or the vision to interpret the world and to act. It has a growing diicoltà Differenciate from the right. This lack of projects and ideas is masked by a rhetoric based on the defense of traditional values: solidarity, equality, freedom and tolerance. The point is that the socialist parties seem to remember the importance of these values \u200b\u200bonly when the opposition to forget when they go to the government. The European Socialists are facing a critical crossroads: either they develop a credible or are destined to disappear slowly. What to do with the crisis of globalization? How to react to riiuto of Europeans towards liberalism? How Afront the disappointment and skepticism of the working classes and middle? The birth of a new European welfare state, now more necessary than ever, depends on the answers that the European left will be able to give to these questions. sb
THE AUTHOR Sami Nair is a French political scientist of Algerian origin. He teaches at the University Paris VIII and is working with several European newspapers, including El País and Libération.
Sami Naïr, "El Pais", Spain by 'The International' 
European socialism is undergoing a profound crisis. If we leave aside the Scandinavian social democracies of the landscape is where the social conlittualità is less acute, and infants socialist parties of Eastern Europe, we can see that in other cases - France, Britain, Germany, Italy - live the socialist parties a period of great diicoltà. The only exception is Spain. In France, the crisis began in 2000 with the failure of the "plural left". Policies for economic recovery in 1997 was followed by a more liberal since 1999. Lionel Jospin, the Socialist leader and then prime minister, was the symbol of this change in course. When the increase of abstention multinational election. In Britain, the symbol of the failure of New Labour has been the disappearance of its founder, Tony Blair. On balance, the much celebrated third way was not merely a repetition, the more watered down and winking of Thatcherism, based on the dismantling of public services and privatization. Today the Labour Party is in free fall. During the last Congress leader Gordon Brown has proposed an alternative welfare state, based on a "new economic, social and political" and "market regulation". But he has speciicato where resources should go to inanza his project and has not clarified how it intends to convince the middle classes, who want more social welfare and lower taxes at the same time. Britain is not part of the euro zone and therefore has more freedom in managing public debt and deicit budget, which reached respectively 80 and 12.4 percent of GDP. But the number of unemployed, who are already three million, is expected to grow: Iscala without incentives and without further increases in public spending seems impossible to save the jobs. From Rome to Berlin In Italy the Socialist Left has collapsed in the nineties and was sucked into a black hole. The birth of the PD, with the alliance between former Communists and the Christian Democrats, has had two negative consequences: the death of socialism, understood as the ideological and political project, and the creation of a large basin for the election of reactionary populism Silvio Berlusconi. The current crisis in the Berlusconi benefit more than the left is exposing its weakness. In Germany the Social Democratic Party (SPD) has been in crisis since 2000, when one of its leaders, Oskar Lafontaine, riiutò to support the liberal turn of Gerhard Schröder. In 2005, the SPD has lost the elections and agreed to form a coalition government with the Christian Democrats International
823 November 27, 2009 19 (CDU). Get used to weave alliances with Right, the Social Democrats have not been able to offer credible solutions to the crisis and today are the party of the European left in greater diicoltà. In addition to the split be desired by Lafontaine, founder of the leftist party Die Linke, since 1998 the SPD has lost about ten million votes, even in favor of Green, Liberal and Christian Democrat, and the recent election to the presidency of Sigmar Gabriel, without a centrist ideological proilo Dein, suiciente does not seem to change things. This brief overview of a new welfare system allows us to identify some trends. First of all the Western socialist parties in the nineties have agreed to adapt to globalization, choosing the so-called third way: not oferta just do not have an alternative plan to their traditional constituency (the middle classes and popular), but do not even understand all the consequences of their choice. In this way have become more aidabili from the standpoint of government, but have lost much of their identity. Hence the current paradox: the socialist parties are overwhelmed by the crisis of liberalism, while the liberal right not hesitate to apply the traditional recipes for the welfare Afront recession. In other words, the right is proving to be more pragmatic of the left, abandoned socialist ideas, he blindly aidata the virtues of social liberalism. In Western Europe, moreover, the left-wing forces are incapable of react to the shift to the right of society, a phenomenon that is the result of the instability created by the deregulation of economic and social development of recent years and that translates into strong demand for security (social, economic and identity) and a return to nationalism. These two underlying trends are present everywhere in Europe, lay bare the serious identity crisis of social democracy, which no longer has a project speciico. In the past 15 years, the victory of liberalism was not only economic, has been largely ideological and cultural. The left does not seem to have more tools, methods, or the vision to interpret the world and to act. It has a growing diicoltà Differenciate from the right. This lack of projects and ideas is masked by a rhetoric based on the defense of traditional values: solidarity, equality, freedom and tolerance. The point is that the socialist parties seem to remember the importance of these values \u200b\u200bonly when the opposition to forget when they go to the government. The European Socialists are facing a critical crossroads: either they develop a credible or are destined to disappear slowly. What to do with the crisis of globalization? How to react to riiuto of Europeans towards liberalism? How Afront the disappointment and skepticism of the working classes and middle? The birth of a new European welfare state, now more necessary than ever, depends on the answers that the European left will be able to give to these questions. sb
THE AUTHOR Sami Nair is a French political scientist of Algerian origin. He teaches at the University Paris VIII and is working with several European newspapers, including El País and Libération.
Sami Naïr, "El Pais", Spain by 'The International'
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Port Royale 2 Eror C0000005
The world hostage to the rentiers
The economic crisis, that our unknown. It is presented as the current recession, alternating the prediction of a close out from it to a reading that indicates the long term the temporal dimension. At the same time, the oscillation between hope, by mainstream economic theory, to get out in continuity with the past and the belief that "nothing will ever be the" marks the public discussion. In an interview with George Lunghini begins a survey on how authoritative Italian economists address the nature of the current crisis. Scholar known to readers of "the manifesto," Lunghini proposes to read the crisis in a historical perspective is that of critical analysis of capitalism.
The fundamental questions to which economists seeking an answer can be summarized thus: what is the nature of this crisis is a crisis in financial or real, cyclical or systemic? It makes sense to compare with the crisis of '29?
An economic system capitalist - a monetary economy of production, in the language of Keynes - is unthinkable without money, without banks, without finance, therefore, in the structure of the real elements and assets / liabilities are closely intertwined. Between the actual items and monetary items but there is a hierarchy in the sense that a capitalist economic system could reproduce without crisis, to use the language of Marx, if the distribution of the social product was such as to not generate crises of implementation, "overproduction "(a relative overproduction: compared to purchasing power, not to the needs), and if money, banking and finance were only functional in the process of production and reproduction of the system, and instead gave rise to crisis sovraspeculazione and hoarding.
In the language of Keynes, crisis would not be if actual demand, consumption and investment, and the demand for money on the ground were such speculation - by accident or design - to ensure a balance of full employment. Now it is unlikely that this case will give automatically, hence the need for a systematic design of economic policy. In short, the capitalist system - the "market" - is unable to regulate itself. In all of this has an essential role in the rate of profits, as shown by the classical economists, but above all Marx, tends to fall. When the rate of profits is likely to generate crises of realization, since there is associated low wages and unemployment, and a time so as to generate hoarding crisis, the capitalist system undergoes a crisis that, if you want you can call systemic. So it was in the crisis of '29 (whose roots date back to 1870), so it is today. In both cases - and what I merely, as the comparison between the '29 and now - the crisis occurred after a failed attempt to counter the falling rate of profit with a process of globalization, reduction world market. I add only that the European response to the crisis of '29 was the Nazi-Fascism.
As he played, in their inability to assess the likelihood of the crisis, the mainstream economists' predilection for formalizing mathematics, at the expense of knowledge of the history of economic analysis - and history in general?
In itself the use of mathematics in economic analysis is not blameworthy, so when it wants to deal with questions in mathematical form that does not permit, or when it comes to issues important because they allow a mathematical treatment. Of gender issues in economics, there are many. Visiting the London School of Economics last year, Queen Elizabeth had asked him - royal white - how come only a few economists had predicted the crisis. Ten prominent British economists have also written a letter to the Queen, in which they write that one of the main reasons of the inability of the profession to give early warnings of impending crisis is inadequate training of economists focused on mathematical techniques: so that the economy - the economics - has become a branch of applied mathematics.
The signatories of the letter also points out that the unsuspecting American Economic Association was established in 1988, a post-graduate teaching committee in the U.S. economy. The commission, in its conclusion, he expressed the fear that 'post-graduate training programs can produce a generation with too many idiot savants, trained in techniques but ignorant of economic issues important. Education of economists, add the signatories of the letter is omitted economic history, philosophy and psychology, and are not put into question the questionable belief in "rationality" universal nor the 'efficient market hypothesis " . For this reason you are not given due weight to warnings about not quantified the potential instability of the global financial system. There is a type of opinion other than that which can be drawn on immersing himself in literature and history, which can not be adequately expressed in mathematical models. In short, mathematics decontextualizes its objects, and in the economic field that carries the risk of reductionism and the false neutrality. The only antidote is knowledge of history and awareness - awareness of the proud - the political dimension of economic analysis.
authoritative commentators have long pointed out that the free movement of capital and bustling (the result of liberalization and deregulation of finance) mini the very basis of economic democracy, that democracy itself. Believes that the role of politics today, would only be that of market regulator or should go further?
There is no doubt that the free movement of capital, free to the extent and in its present form, is dangerous for democracy and economic So for democracy in general. It is the thesis of the "virtual senate", a thesis on which insisted Noam Chomsky (who borrows from B. Eichengreen) and it seems to me difficult to refute. This virtual senate is made up of lenders and investors who continually undergoing review the policies of national governments, and if they judge that "irrational" those policies - because contrary to their interests - voting against them with capital flight, attacks hedge or other measures against those countries (and in particular the various forms of social status).
Democratic governments thus have a double vote: their citizens and the virtual senate, which normally prevails. This is a led to the liberalization of capital movements, reckless, in turn effect the dismantling of the Bretton Woods system in the seventies: are the obvious consequences for economic democracy (the most affected are the weakest among citizens of different countries) and So for democracy in general.
I believe that economic policy should go beyond the simple regulation of markets, but even if it was limited to this should be a shared design of economic policy and financial markets. A new plan Keynes - who had well understood the risks of uncontrolled movement of capital - it does not seem in sight.
Many scholars believe that the solution of the crisis can not be that Washington-Beijing axis. It is conceivable that the European model of social status, even if one can speak a European model, can be a reference for alternative economic policies as the "Washington Consensus", as the Chinese state capitalism? Or is there a risk that the future economic-political world in Europe (with the southern hemisphere) is confined to a marginal position?
I fear that the European model of welfare state is no longer a model even for Europeans. The welfare state is one of the greatest inventions and institutional policies of the past century, the destruction of a most serious responsibility of European governments in recent decades. The responsibility is all the more serious, since even before it has a cultural policy. Even in Europe has had a virtual senate, but also has a weighted membership uncritical, ahistorical and do not require the circumstances, the imperial liberalism: that has nothing to do with the liberal tradition, even before the Social-Democratic Europe. In truth there never was a true European model of welfare state, the national variants had different stories and articles. What still stands as a model intellectually - in model design direction to be taken for example, and they should look first to the last Keynesians now - is the "Social Philosophy" which could conduct the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money by Keynes.
Today, as then the "defects" of the more obvious economic society in which we live are the inability to ensure full employment and an arbitrary and inequitable distribution of wealth and income (which are among the main causes of the current crisis). To remedy these defects, Keynes offers three lines of action: a redistribution of income via taxation (progressive income taxes and high inheritance taxes), euthanasia of the rentier, and certainly not small, state intervention in ' economy. The redistribution of income would increase the average propensity to consumption and therefore demand effective. The euthanasia of the rentier, then the "cumulative and oppressive power of the capitalist to exploit the scarcity value of capital," would also reasonable investment and low profitability in the eyes of deferred accounts, which are normally high social return on investment.
As regards the involvement of the state, according to Keynes of The end of laissez faire, "the most important action does not relate to those activities which private individuals already play, but to those functions that fall outside the range action of individuals, if no one takes those decisions are not taken by the state. The important thing for the government is not doing what people already do, and do a little 'bit better or a' worse, but do what you do not at present of all. " If the defects reported by Keynes had been amended with the measures he mentioned, this crisis would not be there (sometimes counterfactual reasoning are effective), and on the other hand I fear it is unlikely that this social philosophy is put into practice in the world today West. So out of the crisis
Washington-Beijing axis? Some negotiation between the U.S. and China is imposed by the new structure of international division of labor, but what is the strategy of Beijing? The world recognizes that China is emerging as a great power, but it's a shame - he wrote recently, the Economist - That still does not always act as such.
The current increase in public expenditure does not affect social spending (education, health, pensions and unemployment benefits), but the rescue of banks, finance companies and large groups. What happens, however, squeezing the earnings (real wages and pensions): an intervention on the supply side rather than demand, it is the right strategy to overcome the crisis, returning to acceptable levels of unemployment?
the need for a redistribution of income via taxation, the desirability of euthanasia of the rentier, and the need for active intervention of the state have already said. The supply-side policies are part of this theoretical paradigm, whose acceptance by governments has led to the current crisis. Unemployment and the fear of losing their jobs trigger a vicious circle: consumers and businesses reduce their costs, generating new employment cuts. As long as wages and employment will not be traced at least to the levels of ten or twenty years ago, the crisis is over.
What is the price that future generations will have to endure in the face of forms and size of debt that governments have used today in an effort not to wreck the world economy?
If that debt had been contracted to provide education, health and assistance to citizens, future generations should not bear any price, as compared with that debt would be today and tomorrow those structures and those services. The price you pay is the lack of those facilities and those services, because of a debt that was contracted for the benefit of those individuals that have caused the current crisis.
Cosma Orsi, "the manifesto," November 18, 2009 
The economic crisis, that our unknown. It is presented as the current recession, alternating the prediction of a close out from it to a reading that indicates the long term the temporal dimension. At the same time, the oscillation between hope, by mainstream economic theory, to get out in continuity with the past and the belief that "nothing will ever be the" marks the public discussion. In an interview with George Lunghini begins a survey on how authoritative Italian economists address the nature of the current crisis. Scholar known to readers of "the manifesto," Lunghini proposes to read the crisis in a historical perspective is that of critical analysis of capitalism.
The fundamental questions to which economists seeking an answer can be summarized thus: what is the nature of this crisis is a crisis in financial or real, cyclical or systemic? It makes sense to compare with the crisis of '29?
An economic system capitalist - a monetary economy of production, in the language of Keynes - is unthinkable without money, without banks, without finance, therefore, in the structure of the real elements and assets / liabilities are closely intertwined. Between the actual items and monetary items but there is a hierarchy in the sense that a capitalist economic system could reproduce without crisis, to use the language of Marx, if the distribution of the social product was such as to not generate crises of implementation, "overproduction "(a relative overproduction: compared to purchasing power, not to the needs), and if money, banking and finance were only functional in the process of production and reproduction of the system, and instead gave rise to crisis sovraspeculazione and hoarding.
In the language of Keynes, crisis would not be if actual demand, consumption and investment, and the demand for money on the ground were such speculation - by accident or design - to ensure a balance of full employment. Now it is unlikely that this case will give automatically, hence the need for a systematic design of economic policy. In short, the capitalist system - the "market" - is unable to regulate itself. In all of this has an essential role in the rate of profits, as shown by the classical economists, but above all Marx, tends to fall. When the rate of profits is likely to generate crises of realization, since there is associated low wages and unemployment, and a time so as to generate hoarding crisis, the capitalist system undergoes a crisis that, if you want you can call systemic. So it was in the crisis of '29 (whose roots date back to 1870), so it is today. In both cases - and what I merely, as the comparison between the '29 and now - the crisis occurred after a failed attempt to counter the falling rate of profit with a process of globalization, reduction world market. I add only that the European response to the crisis of '29 was the Nazi-Fascism.
As he played, in their inability to assess the likelihood of the crisis, the mainstream economists' predilection for formalizing mathematics, at the expense of knowledge of the history of economic analysis - and history in general?
In itself the use of mathematics in economic analysis is not blameworthy, so when it wants to deal with questions in mathematical form that does not permit, or when it comes to issues important because they allow a mathematical treatment. Of gender issues in economics, there are many. Visiting the London School of Economics last year, Queen Elizabeth had asked him - royal white - how come only a few economists had predicted the crisis. Ten prominent British economists have also written a letter to the Queen, in which they write that one of the main reasons of the inability of the profession to give early warnings of impending crisis is inadequate training of economists focused on mathematical techniques: so that the economy - the economics - has become a branch of applied mathematics.
The signatories of the letter also points out that the unsuspecting American Economic Association was established in 1988, a post-graduate teaching committee in the U.S. economy. The commission, in its conclusion, he expressed the fear that 'post-graduate training programs can produce a generation with too many idiot savants, trained in techniques but ignorant of economic issues important. Education of economists, add the signatories of the letter is omitted economic history, philosophy and psychology, and are not put into question the questionable belief in "rationality" universal nor the 'efficient market hypothesis " . For this reason you are not given due weight to warnings about not quantified the potential instability of the global financial system. There is a type of opinion other than that which can be drawn on immersing himself in literature and history, which can not be adequately expressed in mathematical models. In short, mathematics decontextualizes its objects, and in the economic field that carries the risk of reductionism and the false neutrality. The only antidote is knowledge of history and awareness - awareness of the proud - the political dimension of economic analysis.
authoritative commentators have long pointed out that the free movement of capital and bustling (the result of liberalization and deregulation of finance) mini the very basis of economic democracy, that democracy itself. Believes that the role of politics today, would only be that of market regulator or should go further?
There is no doubt that the free movement of capital, free to the extent and in its present form, is dangerous for democracy and economic So for democracy in general. It is the thesis of the "virtual senate", a thesis on which insisted Noam Chomsky (who borrows from B. Eichengreen) and it seems to me difficult to refute. This virtual senate is made up of lenders and investors who continually undergoing review the policies of national governments, and if they judge that "irrational" those policies - because contrary to their interests - voting against them with capital flight, attacks hedge or other measures against those countries (and in particular the various forms of social status).
Democratic governments thus have a double vote: their citizens and the virtual senate, which normally prevails. This is a led to the liberalization of capital movements, reckless, in turn effect the dismantling of the Bretton Woods system in the seventies: are the obvious consequences for economic democracy (the most affected are the weakest among citizens of different countries) and So for democracy in general.
I believe that economic policy should go beyond the simple regulation of markets, but even if it was limited to this should be a shared design of economic policy and financial markets. A new plan Keynes - who had well understood the risks of uncontrolled movement of capital - it does not seem in sight.
Many scholars believe that the solution of the crisis can not be that Washington-Beijing axis. It is conceivable that the European model of social status, even if one can speak a European model, can be a reference for alternative economic policies as the "Washington Consensus", as the Chinese state capitalism? Or is there a risk that the future economic-political world in Europe (with the southern hemisphere) is confined to a marginal position?
I fear that the European model of welfare state is no longer a model even for Europeans. The welfare state is one of the greatest inventions and institutional policies of the past century, the destruction of a most serious responsibility of European governments in recent decades. The responsibility is all the more serious, since even before it has a cultural policy. Even in Europe has had a virtual senate, but also has a weighted membership uncritical, ahistorical and do not require the circumstances, the imperial liberalism: that has nothing to do with the liberal tradition, even before the Social-Democratic Europe. In truth there never was a true European model of welfare state, the national variants had different stories and articles. What still stands as a model intellectually - in model design direction to be taken for example, and they should look first to the last Keynesians now - is the "Social Philosophy" which could conduct the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money by Keynes.
Today, as then the "defects" of the more obvious economic society in which we live are the inability to ensure full employment and an arbitrary and inequitable distribution of wealth and income (which are among the main causes of the current crisis). To remedy these defects, Keynes offers three lines of action: a redistribution of income via taxation (progressive income taxes and high inheritance taxes), euthanasia of the rentier, and certainly not small, state intervention in ' economy. The redistribution of income would increase the average propensity to consumption and therefore demand effective. The euthanasia of the rentier, then the "cumulative and oppressive power of the capitalist to exploit the scarcity value of capital," would also reasonable investment and low profitability in the eyes of deferred accounts, which are normally high social return on investment.
As regards the involvement of the state, according to Keynes of The end of laissez faire, "the most important action does not relate to those activities which private individuals already play, but to those functions that fall outside the range action of individuals, if no one takes those decisions are not taken by the state. The important thing for the government is not doing what people already do, and do a little 'bit better or a' worse, but do what you do not at present of all. " If the defects reported by Keynes had been amended with the measures he mentioned, this crisis would not be there (sometimes counterfactual reasoning are effective), and on the other hand I fear it is unlikely that this social philosophy is put into practice in the world today West. So out of the crisis
Washington-Beijing axis? Some negotiation between the U.S. and China is imposed by the new structure of international division of labor, but what is the strategy of Beijing? The world recognizes that China is emerging as a great power, but it's a shame - he wrote recently, the Economist - That still does not always act as such.
The current increase in public expenditure does not affect social spending (education, health, pensions and unemployment benefits), but the rescue of banks, finance companies and large groups. What happens, however, squeezing the earnings (real wages and pensions): an intervention on the supply side rather than demand, it is the right strategy to overcome the crisis, returning to acceptable levels of unemployment?
the need for a redistribution of income via taxation, the desirability of euthanasia of the rentier, and the need for active intervention of the state have already said. The supply-side policies are part of this theoretical paradigm, whose acceptance by governments has led to the current crisis. Unemployment and the fear of losing their jobs trigger a vicious circle: consumers and businesses reduce their costs, generating new employment cuts. As long as wages and employment will not be traced at least to the levels of ten or twenty years ago, the crisis is over.
What is the price that future generations will have to endure in the face of forms and size of debt that governments have used today in an effort not to wreck the world economy?
If that debt had been contracted to provide education, health and assistance to citizens, future generations should not bear any price, as compared with that debt would be today and tomorrow those structures and those services. The price you pay is the lack of those facilities and those services, because of a debt that was contracted for the benefit of those individuals that have caused the current crisis.
Cosma Orsi, "the manifesto," November 18, 2009
Buzz Words That Drive You Crazy
Merkel invests in research. A nice slap Italy
The center-right government of Angela Merkel has announced its legislative program for research and high education: more than 5% increase per year until 2015 for funding to the two major government research centers, the Max Planck Society and the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft), more 7.7 billion more than EUR 5 billion, new and additional to the university from 2011 to 2015 of which 5 billion for the overall development and 2.7 billion dedicated to the 'Initiative for Excellence ", and finally 14, € 6 billion for the development of high technology in areas considered strategic: energy, climate, health and safety. To overcome the crisis, therefore, Germany focuses on the "knowledge package" With more and more science training. The program is very significant for at least three reasons. First comes after a year in which, despite the recession, the federal government's investment in science and development grew by 10%. According to re-propose this as the program of the previous center-left government, led by Chancellor Merkel herself, a continuity that shows how science and high education is a strategic choice despite the alternation of governments. Third, the program is, as in Italy, on the promotion of merit, in Berlin is not only supported by the words and rules, but by concrete investments. Two particular aspects affecting. The first concerns the 'Initiative for Excellence ", or the attempt to reward those universities that are better. So far the initiative has been able to count on a pilot phase of three years, funded with € 30 million per year, which gave work to 4,200 researchers, for most young people, of which 40% women and 25% from abroad (many from Italy). Another aspect relates to high technology. Most research has focused on investments in the renewable energy sector. With a successful ten years in renewable energy rose from 6 to 17% of the total.
Peter's Greek, "L'Unita, 16 November 2009 
The center-right government of Angela Merkel has announced its legislative program for research and high education: more than 5% increase per year until 2015 for funding to the two major government research centers, the Max Planck Society and the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft), more 7.7 billion more than EUR 5 billion, new and additional to the university from 2011 to 2015 of which 5 billion for the overall development and 2.7 billion dedicated to the 'Initiative for Excellence ", and finally 14, € 6 billion for the development of high technology in areas considered strategic: energy, climate, health and safety. To overcome the crisis, therefore, Germany focuses on the "knowledge package" With more and more science training. The program is very significant for at least three reasons. First comes after a year in which, despite the recession, the federal government's investment in science and development grew by 10%. According to re-propose this as the program of the previous center-left government, led by Chancellor Merkel herself, a continuity that shows how science and high education is a strategic choice despite the alternation of governments. Third, the program is, as in Italy, on the promotion of merit, in Berlin is not only supported by the words and rules, but by concrete investments. Two particular aspects affecting. The first concerns the 'Initiative for Excellence ", or the attempt to reward those universities that are better. So far the initiative has been able to count on a pilot phase of three years, funded with € 30 million per year, which gave work to 4,200 researchers, for most young people, of which 40% women and 25% from abroad (many from Italy). Another aspect relates to high technology. Most research has focused on investments in the renewable energy sector. With a successful ten years in renewable energy rose from 6 to 17% of the total.
Peter's Greek, "L'Unita, 16 November 2009
Jobst Compression Buffalo
The extinction of the State
institutions can survive in an environment where it becomes their de-legitimize a deliberate political strategy? What happens when respect for the Constitution is forced to take refuge in places more and more restricted? We are taking an anomalous and disturbing to the extinction of the Italian way State?
Italy is becoming a laboratory where perverse elsewhere controllable elements are combined in ways that infect the entire system. And the contagion spread from politics to society, where every day we staged the degradation of language, the contempt of the rules, the brutal exercise of power. Faced with claims particularly devastating and interventions, such as those that distort the rule of law in the name of only one, it evokes the "state of exception", a political category constructed to justify the authoritarian exercise of government power and that , however, reveals a nobility that is found in the intellectual miserable Italian practice in these times. Which are now so widespread and entrenched that neither the state of exception are talking about something just as exceptional. As we spoke of "permanent emergency" to impose authoritarian logic and tamper with the rights, so it is reasonable to define the state of Italian affairs as a "permanent state of exception".
have the same constitutional principles to be routinely violated, beginning with that of equality. Do not forget that the Constitutional Court declared illegal the "Lodo Alfano" because of its contrast with that principle. We must still remember the face of proposals to approve a constitutional law that would recall the content of that text: this kind of law must respect the equality. He noted since 1988 the Constitutional Court, claiming that the "supreme principles" of the Italian can not be "subverted or changed in their essential content even more by constitutional amendment or other constitutional laws." Among these principles stands out just what equality among citizens.
But inequality has been codified in many laws, has penetrated deeply into society, are creating categories of "sottocittadini. The shame of the "short trial" there is a greatest shame of exclusion from the benefits of illegal immigrants. This erosion the foundations of coexistence denies the universality of fundamental rights, the rejection of legitimate and different, and so opens the door to the phenomena of racism and homophobia that may become a permanent member of the Italian landscape.
Once set aside the principles, the distortion of the institutional system becomes inevitable, and daily, and is no longer sufficient to explain the appeal of the conflict of interests embodied by the President of the Council. There has been a new form of "balance", where mix public and private resources, political influence is combined with economic pressure, companies in the galaxy Berlusconi joints become political determinants. This is revealed, among other things, not just the continuum Mediaset / Rai and ads standardization of TV channels is still a bit 'outside the box, but also the operations that affect the overall structure of telecommunications, the newspaper ownership, the financial system.
A power that has gradually concentrated in few hands, with a clear idea of \u200b\u200bthe state which owns the other institutions and reset control. We know the drift that is sweeping the Parliament, dispossessed of every function, and that led to a resounding decision to "lock" of ten days of the House of Representatives, decided by the President to denounce the impossibility work.
A fact unprecedented, which should have led to strong reactions, which was rather reduced to skirmishes between Berlusconi and Fini. The legislative power is firmly in the hands of the government through legal decrees and laws delegation, and thanks to the spread of "civil protection order, free from any parliamentary control and carry more and more general rules, well beyond emergency justifying it. But it is above the constitutional dimension to be evaporated.
The Constitution no longer belongs to Parliament, so much so that for every law under discussion is debating whether the President of the Republic the sign or not, what are the risks of a declaration of illegality by the Constitutional Court. The guardians of the Constitution are elsewhere, and the Constitution itself is likely to see changed its meaning if a central institution, the Parliament, it behaves as if it were foreign.
Many institutional areas are so desertified, also taking a pretext real or alleged inefficiencies. It documents the very short periods of work of Parliament and he was inspired to denounce Members lazy, not to indicate measures to revitalize the Parliament, possible today. The same technique is used to attack the judiciary and justify yet another law on a personal basis, that short trial, justified with the argument of undue length of proceedings. But it is the 1999 reform of Article 111 of the Constitution that speaks of their "reasonable time" for years that the European Court of Human Rights condemns us for the length of the justice system, the failure of the judicial administration that decades can be defined as "a social catastrophe." So sensitive to the problem, the center-right majority has not lifted a finger in the process of government between 2001 and 2006, very interventionist in matters of justice, but not to adopt measures and allocate resources to cut the time trial, but to go all 'assault on the independence of judiciary. It now wants to take advantage of this situation to steal Berlusconi processes and deal a further blow to the credibility and efficiency of the judiciary.
A "dialogue" on constitutional reforms, and the same daily political opposition, can not ignore this. It must be remembered that the Constitution ends with an article today that calls for special attention. It is written in 139: "The form of Republic shall not be subject to constitutional review." This does not mean mundane that you can not return to the monarchy. It means that our constitutional system has a number of characteristics that define the "republican form" and that can not be changed without going to a different regime. That's what you do not tire of repeating, with moderation and firmness, the President of the Republic
Stefano Rodota La Repubblica, 20.11.2009 
institutions can survive in an environment where it becomes their de-legitimize a deliberate political strategy? What happens when respect for the Constitution is forced to take refuge in places more and more restricted? We are taking an anomalous and disturbing to the extinction of the Italian way State?
Italy is becoming a laboratory where perverse elsewhere controllable elements are combined in ways that infect the entire system. And the contagion spread from politics to society, where every day we staged the degradation of language, the contempt of the rules, the brutal exercise of power. Faced with claims particularly devastating and interventions, such as those that distort the rule of law in the name of only one, it evokes the "state of exception", a political category constructed to justify the authoritarian exercise of government power and that , however, reveals a nobility that is found in the intellectual miserable Italian practice in these times. Which are now so widespread and entrenched that neither the state of exception are talking about something just as exceptional. As we spoke of "permanent emergency" to impose authoritarian logic and tamper with the rights, so it is reasonable to define the state of Italian affairs as a "permanent state of exception".
have the same constitutional principles to be routinely violated, beginning with that of equality. Do not forget that the Constitutional Court declared illegal the "Lodo Alfano" because of its contrast with that principle. We must still remember the face of proposals to approve a constitutional law that would recall the content of that text: this kind of law must respect the equality. He noted since 1988 the Constitutional Court, claiming that the "supreme principles" of the Italian can not be "subverted or changed in their essential content even more by constitutional amendment or other constitutional laws." Among these principles stands out just what equality among citizens.
But inequality has been codified in many laws, has penetrated deeply into society, are creating categories of "sottocittadini. The shame of the "short trial" there is a greatest shame of exclusion from the benefits of illegal immigrants. This erosion the foundations of coexistence denies the universality of fundamental rights, the rejection of legitimate and different, and so opens the door to the phenomena of racism and homophobia that may become a permanent member of the Italian landscape.
Once set aside the principles, the distortion of the institutional system becomes inevitable, and daily, and is no longer sufficient to explain the appeal of the conflict of interests embodied by the President of the Council. There has been a new form of "balance", where mix public and private resources, political influence is combined with economic pressure, companies in the galaxy Berlusconi joints become political determinants. This is revealed, among other things, not just the continuum Mediaset / Rai and ads standardization of TV channels is still a bit 'outside the box, but also the operations that affect the overall structure of telecommunications, the newspaper ownership, the financial system.
A power that has gradually concentrated in few hands, with a clear idea of \u200b\u200bthe state which owns the other institutions and reset control. We know the drift that is sweeping the Parliament, dispossessed of every function, and that led to a resounding decision to "lock" of ten days of the House of Representatives, decided by the President to denounce the impossibility work.
A fact unprecedented, which should have led to strong reactions, which was rather reduced to skirmishes between Berlusconi and Fini. The legislative power is firmly in the hands of the government through legal decrees and laws delegation, and thanks to the spread of "civil protection order, free from any parliamentary control and carry more and more general rules, well beyond emergency justifying it. But it is above the constitutional dimension to be evaporated.
The Constitution no longer belongs to Parliament, so much so that for every law under discussion is debating whether the President of the Republic the sign or not, what are the risks of a declaration of illegality by the Constitutional Court. The guardians of the Constitution are elsewhere, and the Constitution itself is likely to see changed its meaning if a central institution, the Parliament, it behaves as if it were foreign.
Many institutional areas are so desertified, also taking a pretext real or alleged inefficiencies. It documents the very short periods of work of Parliament and he was inspired to denounce Members lazy, not to indicate measures to revitalize the Parliament, possible today. The same technique is used to attack the judiciary and justify yet another law on a personal basis, that short trial, justified with the argument of undue length of proceedings. But it is the 1999 reform of Article 111 of the Constitution that speaks of their "reasonable time" for years that the European Court of Human Rights condemns us for the length of the justice system, the failure of the judicial administration that decades can be defined as "a social catastrophe." So sensitive to the problem, the center-right majority has not lifted a finger in the process of government between 2001 and 2006, very interventionist in matters of justice, but not to adopt measures and allocate resources to cut the time trial, but to go all 'assault on the independence of judiciary. It now wants to take advantage of this situation to steal Berlusconi processes and deal a further blow to the credibility and efficiency of the judiciary.
A "dialogue" on constitutional reforms, and the same daily political opposition, can not ignore this. It must be remembered that the Constitution ends with an article today that calls for special attention. It is written in 139: "The form of Republic shall not be subject to constitutional review." This does not mean mundane that you can not return to the monarchy. It means that our constitutional system has a number of characteristics that define the "republican form" and that can not be changed without going to a different regime. That's what you do not tire of repeating, with moderation and firmness, the President of the Republic
Stefano Rodota La Repubblica, 20.11.2009
Monday, November 16, 2009
Template Of Baby Footprints
The "bourgeoisie Camorra"? There, but nobody talks about white collar
the importance of crime powerful interpretation of the processes of institutionalization and legitimization of the Camorra crime phenomenon that receives direct and indirect forms of large sections of the bourgeoisie in the metropolitan Naples is not as radical and continuity of interpretation that record, however, about the "bourgeoisie Mafia. " The question, then, is not farfetched: why? (...) Why do not you rooted for the criminal organization Camorra a tradition of learning (and Address Detective) able to explain and interpret what is the role that class segments of professional, entrepreneurial, bureaucratic, technical - in short, to what reason can be described as middle class has historically been the Camorra mafia to ensure its reproducibility? The reasons for this delay is attributable to both a sort of systematic defection on the Camorra, its culture, its commingling by the great doctrines such as liberalism and Catholicism, both to wandering positions of the left that has ranged between crystallization and the long silences or distortions of interpretation on the phenomenon. (...) The connections between members of the bourgeoisie and the Camorra crime groups have been denied or even often underestimated, despite the dominant urban character of the original delinquency exposing these components to cross social relations, so that awareness of collusive this intrigue was already manifested in 1901 by Saredo who spoke of "low" and "high" Camorra, it "constituted by astute and daring bourgeois."
"High Camorra" The distorted perception of
delittuosità is, mainly in the bond or social classes characterized by economic instability or the importance of elitist crime of the powerful interpretation of the processes of institutionalization and legitimization of the Camorra crime phenomenon that receives direct and indirect forms by large bourgeoisie of the metropolitan areas of Naples is not as radical and continuity of interpretation that record, however, about the "mafia bourgeoisie." The question, then, is not farfetched: why? (...) Why do not you rooted for the criminal organization Camorra a tradition, which are very distant average observer. That's how it is absent, the vast vanishes "gray area" that hosts a variety of professionals, civil servants, administrative, technical consultants, representatives of the banking, financial, academic, business. And yet, economic operators and intermediaries whose social climbing is based on a modus operandi irregular and illegal activities related to the new professional class of public and private services and offering services to criminal organizations, not infrequently, also members of the forces enforcement and the judiciary. (...) With regard to the context of the myriad Neapolitan its illegal economic activities, para-legal, submerged, allowing illegal to produce, sell and consume goods place them on different markets (legal, illegal and criminal) promotes the interweaving of collusion, cooperation and exchanges with representatives of the local middle classes, or even a push factor, to the point where they can legitimately speak of "bourgeoisie Camorra." The roots groups and organizations Camorra, therefore, derives not only from the social relations they have developed within the populace, the marginalized and economically weak classes, not just the product of a deviant subculture of pollution, but also depends on capacity over time to evolve the relationships of trust and exchange in the direction of a social configuration across different classes and economic strata, to form a social bloc that has played a decisive role in the processes of accumulation of different resources and social relations. (...) The existence of a Camorra, ie an economy based on manufacturing wide range of illegal and criminal activities in the meantime has become a burden and business developments likely to benefit, now, investments and transactions carried out also market conditions because the contribution of the middle class benefits from this Camorra and intertwined relationships that are not only the product of 'deviations professional, "but the result of a stable network commingling and confusing use of trade especially in these "mature" of accumulation, ie when it is necessary to invest the capital in legitimate activities. This is the time when the effects of altering the economic and legal propagate is an increased until it reached a distortionary character of the processes of economic development.
systems and types of market
is misleading to believe that criminal groups thrive because they spread the criminal markets or because of intimidation by the power of the mafia associations are able to dominate both in economic activities than in commercial law. Actually three structural conditions have changed the reasons for the successful expansion of organized crime in Campania: the expansion of the political market, namely the increase in resources that are mobilized in forms of direct or indirect political and administrative institutions, the dynamic entrepreneurial class and collusion between criminal organizations based focused on trade relations now on offering services to businesses and attractive opportunities (such as waste affair has shown) that increase in an indirect profits of enterprises, the expansion in the region and beyond of the informal sector, production of black , semi-legal economies which make up a differentiated set of goods and services produced and distributed in forms illegal entrepreneurs who find it more convenient to "interact" with the mafia rather than attract the attention of the State on the profiles of illegal activities .(..)
The capital
The Camorra develops and grows because it can count on the production of an intense and strong capital. Namely, the production of a set of intangible resources (...) that using the tradition, the deviant subculture, the same religion, the value of social rituals ensures strength, stability and reproducibility part of the clan. (...) These symbolic resources supply in binding form of social action community these greedy more than I can make reference universalistic norms to whether civil, religious or ideological. The positive results are those related to the self-interest is reinforced es'indebolisce I recall the common good. (...) The strength of this capital takes advantage of the fact that local companies have not produced to counter a strong social conscience (at the level of the public sphere of political institutions, civil society, business, cultural institutions ) aware of the seriousness of the presence of such phenomena, not a constant, caring and enlightened mobilization in support of the work of the police, the judiciary, those who busy themselves to combating all forms of lawlessness. (...)
How to get out?
that the judiciary should be attacking the illegal assets and capital accumulated, the fugitives are arrested (the symbol of the defeat of the state) is significantly intervene in the outskirts of urban areas through the action of the school, volunteering, civic groups, has produced a more effective legal and safe control of the territory there is a strong social stigma of all those figures who cooperate, do business and collude with criminal groups (entrepreneurs, professionals, politicians, etc..) both produced a greater synergy between the investigative ball and the 'analytical' (the world of social research) to devise new and more effective policies enforcement and security.
Giacomo Di Gennaro, "Corriere del Mezzogiorno" Dossier on the Camorra and the illegality of the Centre, November 12, 2009. 
"High Camorra" The distorted perception of
delittuosità is, mainly in the bond or social classes characterized by economic instability or the importance of elitist crime of the powerful interpretation of the processes of institutionalization and legitimization of the Camorra crime phenomenon that receives direct and indirect forms by large bourgeoisie of the metropolitan areas of Naples is not as radical and continuity of interpretation that record, however, about the "mafia bourgeoisie." The question, then, is not farfetched: why? (...) Why do not you rooted for the criminal organization Camorra a tradition, which are very distant average observer. That's how it is absent, the vast vanishes "gray area" that hosts a variety of professionals, civil servants, administrative, technical consultants, representatives of the banking, financial, academic, business. And yet, economic operators and intermediaries whose social climbing is based on a modus operandi irregular and illegal activities related to the new professional class of public and private services and offering services to criminal organizations, not infrequently, also members of the forces enforcement and the judiciary. (...) With regard to the context of the myriad Neapolitan its illegal economic activities, para-legal, submerged, allowing illegal to produce, sell and consume goods place them on different markets (legal, illegal and criminal) promotes the interweaving of collusion, cooperation and exchanges with representatives of the local middle classes, or even a push factor, to the point where they can legitimately speak of "bourgeoisie Camorra." The roots groups and organizations Camorra, therefore, derives not only from the social relations they have developed within the populace, the marginalized and economically weak classes, not just the product of a deviant subculture of pollution, but also depends on capacity over time to evolve the relationships of trust and exchange in the direction of a social configuration across different classes and economic strata, to form a social bloc that has played a decisive role in the processes of accumulation of different resources and social relations. (...) The existence of a Camorra, ie an economy based on manufacturing wide range of illegal and criminal activities in the meantime has become a burden and business developments likely to benefit, now, investments and transactions carried out also market conditions because the contribution of the middle class benefits from this Camorra and intertwined relationships that are not only the product of 'deviations professional, "but the result of a stable network commingling and confusing use of trade especially in these "mature" of accumulation, ie when it is necessary to invest the capital in legitimate activities. This is the time when the effects of altering the economic and legal propagate is an increased until it reached a distortionary character of the processes of economic development.
systems and types of market
is misleading to believe that criminal groups thrive because they spread the criminal markets or because of intimidation by the power of the mafia associations are able to dominate both in economic activities than in commercial law. Actually three structural conditions have changed the reasons for the successful expansion of organized crime in Campania: the expansion of the political market, namely the increase in resources that are mobilized in forms of direct or indirect political and administrative institutions, the dynamic entrepreneurial class and collusion between criminal organizations based focused on trade relations now on offering services to businesses and attractive opportunities (such as waste affair has shown) that increase in an indirect profits of enterprises, the expansion in the region and beyond of the informal sector, production of black , semi-legal economies which make up a differentiated set of goods and services produced and distributed in forms illegal entrepreneurs who find it more convenient to "interact" with the mafia rather than attract the attention of the State on the profiles of illegal activities .(..)
The capital
The Camorra develops and grows because it can count on the production of an intense and strong capital. Namely, the production of a set of intangible resources (...) that using the tradition, the deviant subculture, the same religion, the value of social rituals ensures strength, stability and reproducibility part of the clan. (...) These symbolic resources supply in binding form of social action community these greedy more than I can make reference universalistic norms to whether civil, religious or ideological. The positive results are those related to the self-interest is reinforced es'indebolisce I recall the common good. (...) The strength of this capital takes advantage of the fact that local companies have not produced to counter a strong social conscience (at the level of the public sphere of political institutions, civil society, business, cultural institutions ) aware of the seriousness of the presence of such phenomena, not a constant, caring and enlightened mobilization in support of the work of the police, the judiciary, those who busy themselves to combating all forms of lawlessness. (...)
How to get out?
that the judiciary should be attacking the illegal assets and capital accumulated, the fugitives are arrested (the symbol of the defeat of the state) is significantly intervene in the outskirts of urban areas through the action of the school, volunteering, civic groups, has produced a more effective legal and safe control of the territory there is a strong social stigma of all those figures who cooperate, do business and collude with criminal groups (entrepreneurs, professionals, politicians, etc..) both produced a greater synergy between the investigative ball and the 'analytical' (the world of social research) to devise new and more effective policies enforcement and security.
Giacomo Di Gennaro, "Corriere del Mezzogiorno" Dossier on the Camorra and the illegality of the Centre, November 12, 2009.
Does Running Irregulate Your Period
"The government has strengthened the 41 bis, enhanced the effectiveness of the confiscation of goods, etc ...", writes the Journal, the parliamentarians of the PDL is repeated every time there is a case or a case Dell'Utri Cosentino. In other words: if the Mafia had its political contacts, such as judges, "communists" want to prove, the government did not fight. Thesis indisputable. But before you answer the question: what does the mafia "his" political reference should explain what the Mafia today. Alongside the military there is a mafia bourgeoisie inserted into the channels of economic, production of the country and in public administrations. This is non-organic, hard to identify the case, related to the military mafia classic mutualistic relationships: the entrepreneur who is awarded the contract, the politician who does vote, the clerk, the public official who promotes career; the university professor who provides academic support in the assembly, the doctor who provides a job in a private clinic. Each of them increases the penetration of the Mafia in society making it a social catalyst. The membership of the subjects across the Mafia see the opportunity that that candidate can deliver on the basis of his thought mafia, new fertilizer that crosses geographical boundaries, from north to south. Subcontract a public work or made with asphalt, concrete battering is a crime of fraud in public supplies punishable by up to 5 years bargain, which saves money to give to the mafia that has facilitated the contract and ensured that the contracting entity is not contiguous i ran the controls. How does the political referent favors the Mafia? If, for example, will be appointed to CIPE, to face the real needs of the territory and of any serious policy development, ensure resources are allocated for public works. Here's how the tightening of the bourgeoisie to 41 a mafia that helps launch the security packages so there is no record of committing crimes, it becomes a valuable license mafia. Penalties for these offenses that favor the mafia, while not being committed by the mafia, are not exacerbated because the mafia has entered the middle class electorate. The only security package anti-mafia that this government should do is what provides for severe penalties for subcontracts in black and fraud in the exchequer, and is launching the so-called process about which it can use in their actual perpetrators of these offenses.
Sandra Amurri, "the fact", November 13, 2009
Can Walk In Clinics Prescribe Adderall
Milan for the mafia, so favor the entrepreneurs' Ndrangheta
The 'Ndrangheta, which is up wins in Milan Via Montenapoleone, the upper floors of a beautiful old building at number 27. Here until a few months ago were home Kreiamo spa, real estate agency for more than one million Euros turnover per year. Alfredo Iorio majority shareholder is the son of quell'Achille I-rio, who died in 2008, and until then the leader of Forza Italy Cesano Boscone City Council, the country south of the city. Before then, the same Achilles Iorio, Calabrian origins, have led to a shift of money from the 'Ndrangheta in its Kreiamo. In 2006, in fact, their children Andrea and Alfredo become members of the I-river estate. This last name company, because before it was called Sa. Fran with Chief Executive Serafina Papalia, wife of Salvatore Barbaro, who was charged for Mafia association in the process Cerberus, and especially the daughter of superboss of the 'Ndrangheta Rocco Papalia. Today Iorio Realty has become Kreiamo.L 'disturbing plot emerges from the card company of the "South Park" that led to the arrest yesterday of 15 people, including the Alfred I-rio Madaffari and Andrea, vice president of Kreiamo. The decree also appears stationary to an expert of the court on behalf of the clan that Barbaro would have favored a property purchase.
Affairs and the Mafia, then. A mix settled in the area south of Milan. "Here - Giuseppe Gennari writes the investigating judge in his order - the economic operators in the construction industry and construction know that some balance should be aware that some people can not be given negative feedback. " And again: "He is wrong to move and suffers the consequences and do it strictly in silence." Because "the victim's type clear suspects, but it looks good these ideas from the external to the police." Here then is a disarming first conclusion: "Even in some metropolitan areas of the civilized capital of Lombardy is a very lively presence that casts a shadow over the authority of the state." A range of hardness re-launched yesterday by Dr. Ilda Boccassini, head of the new anti-mafia Pool Milan. "The entrepreneur who does not denounce - he said - is defying the state."
The position of the prosecutor is justified by the order of over two hundred pages which tells of entrepreneurs who choose silence threatened. Decisive than that of Salvatore Sansone July 28, 2008 he found his real estate agency completely burned. Heard on the spot said: "We know who did it, I expected." But the following questions of the police, the investigating judge writes, "immediately tried to minimize denying previous statements."
There's more. The intimidation of the 'Ndrangheta come from inside the courtroom. During the breaks of hearings delprocesso Cerberus against Salvatore Barbaro, more than once Anthony Perre, '84, emerging boss, yesterday escaped capture, the prosecution approached the heads to force them to recant. Done and done on time, as confirmed by Alessandra pm Desserts, part of the investigation. In addition to
Antonio Perre, said "u cainu, investigators yesterday escaped another bigwig. This is Domenico Papalia, class '83, son of the boss Antonio Papalia. "Unobstructed - Sweet says - does not sleep more than three days in the house, does not use mobile phones and we have found two bugs." He, who recently married a girl tied to the clan of St. Luke, is the true representative of the 'Ndrangheta in the north. And as such has a strong network of supporters. He is currently a resident in Via Vivaldi Buccinasco. Raiding more than once is to be joined by two cars followed, scrutinized and accompanied out of the country. In this area the network of the mafia gang-Papalia Barbaro is strong enough to support even the fugitives. It 's the case of Paul Sergi Platì found in the June 8, 2008 in an apartment on a Fallen Assago. In a box of the same street, about a month ago, were discovered several weapons, including Kalashnikov rifles, sawed-off shotguns and hand grenades. A real santabarbara the thigh, headed by Salvatore Barbaro and Domenico Papalia, tested in the yards of earthmoving. Evidence of some eavesdropping.
Milosa of David, "the daily", 4 November 2009 
The 'Ndrangheta, which is up wins in Milan Via Montenapoleone, the upper floors of a beautiful old building at number 27. Here until a few months ago were home Kreiamo spa, real estate agency for more than one million Euros turnover per year. Alfredo Iorio majority shareholder is the son of quell'Achille I-rio, who died in 2008, and until then the leader of Forza Italy Cesano Boscone City Council, the country south of the city. Before then, the same Achilles Iorio, Calabrian origins, have led to a shift of money from the 'Ndrangheta in its Kreiamo. In 2006, in fact, their children Andrea and Alfredo become members of the I-river estate. This last name company, because before it was called Sa. Fran with Chief Executive Serafina Papalia, wife of Salvatore Barbaro, who was charged for Mafia association in the process Cerberus, and especially the daughter of superboss of the 'Ndrangheta Rocco Papalia. Today Iorio Realty has become Kreiamo.L 'disturbing plot emerges from the card company of the "South Park" that led to the arrest yesterday of 15 people, including the Alfred I-rio Madaffari and Andrea, vice president of Kreiamo. The decree also appears stationary to an expert of the court on behalf of the clan that Barbaro would have favored a property purchase.
Affairs and the Mafia, then. A mix settled in the area south of Milan. "Here - Giuseppe Gennari writes the investigating judge in his order - the economic operators in the construction industry and construction know that some balance should be aware that some people can not be given negative feedback. " And again: "He is wrong to move and suffers the consequences and do it strictly in silence." Because "the victim's type clear suspects, but it looks good these ideas from the external to the police." Here then is a disarming first conclusion: "Even in some metropolitan areas of the civilized capital of Lombardy is a very lively presence that casts a shadow over the authority of the state." A range of hardness re-launched yesterday by Dr. Ilda Boccassini, head of the new anti-mafia Pool Milan. "The entrepreneur who does not denounce - he said - is defying the state."
The position of the prosecutor is justified by the order of over two hundred pages which tells of entrepreneurs who choose silence threatened. Decisive than that of Salvatore Sansone July 28, 2008 he found his real estate agency completely burned. Heard on the spot said: "We know who did it, I expected." But the following questions of the police, the investigating judge writes, "immediately tried to minimize denying previous statements."
There's more. The intimidation of the 'Ndrangheta come from inside the courtroom. During the breaks of hearings delprocesso Cerberus against Salvatore Barbaro, more than once Anthony Perre, '84, emerging boss, yesterday escaped capture, the prosecution approached the heads to force them to recant. Done and done on time, as confirmed by Alessandra pm Desserts, part of the investigation. In addition to
Antonio Perre, said "u cainu, investigators yesterday escaped another bigwig. This is Domenico Papalia, class '83, son of the boss Antonio Papalia. "Unobstructed - Sweet says - does not sleep more than three days in the house, does not use mobile phones and we have found two bugs." He, who recently married a girl tied to the clan of St. Luke, is the true representative of the 'Ndrangheta in the north. And as such has a strong network of supporters. He is currently a resident in Via Vivaldi Buccinasco. Raiding more than once is to be joined by two cars followed, scrutinized and accompanied out of the country. In this area the network of the mafia gang-Papalia Barbaro is strong enough to support even the fugitives. It 's the case of Paul Sergi Platì found in the June 8, 2008 in an apartment on a Fallen Assago. In a box of the same street, about a month ago, were discovered several weapons, including Kalashnikov rifles, sawed-off shotguns and hand grenades. A real santabarbara the thigh, headed by Salvatore Barbaro and Domenico Papalia, tested in the yards of earthmoving. Evidence of some eavesdropping.
Milosa of David, "the daily", 4 November 2009
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
See Through Underwear For Me
The court order is a power of State Water
The recent rediscovery of the disaster of the ship - filled with tens of thousands of drums of toxic and radioactive waste from Northern Italy and the major industrialized countries of 'Europe and America - sunk in various parts off the Italian peninsula and especially off the coast of Calabria has confirmed that the South of Italy and the Mediterranean have been sentenced to become the center of the spillage of a large part of industrial poisons. After decades, to the tenacious work of the judiciary, are finally emerging the real responsibility of the great western industries that, by using alliances with ruthless gangs and deviant devices of the state, accumulated toxic waste in the Italian ports of industrial processes and referred them to the countries of ' Africa. When they could not in their intent, these death squads were forced to return to Italy the ships loaded with poison that ended up being sunk off the coast of our country, while the criminal powers even cashed the insurance premium of sunken ships . Thanks to the ongoing work of judges and journalists are slowly emerging truths about the death of journalist Ilaria Alpi, killed in Somalia for the discovery of the traffic of toxic waste from Italy.
But the Mediterranean is not the only route flown by the traffickers of waste: thousands of trucks packed with poisons people each day through the streets of Italy, ending their run in their villainous most fertile lands, in what was once called Campania felix the fruitfulness of his land, and deep valleys of Calabria. With those wastes have been poisoned in the hills, valleys, fields and waters around the south, and built the walls of the houses of citizens from Caserta in Crotone die every day, quietly, of horrible evils that never until now had so widely affected this area.
The strong powers of northern Italy have betrayed their mission was to produce industrial goods and services of general interest, and blinded by the profit they have made a pact of steel with the Mafia, Camorra and 'Ndrangheta, for the illegal disposal regions South of toxic waste from their industries and from major industries in western countries.
The President of the Republic, the Hon. Giorgio Napolitano, has confirmed that the traffic of toxic waste comes from northern Italy with a goal in the South. [Insert newspaper quote] In this way the great powers have not only facilitated the formation of financial capital of the thighs mafia, but subject to a ruthless exploitation of the south, rifeudalizzandolo for their purposes.
addition, the strong powers of big business in northern Italy, betraying the cause of the Risorgimento and Italian unity, were associated with the mafia in the perverse and criminal activities of private management of concessions of public procurement, an intermediary financial the great economist Pasquale Saraceno called the true cause of the abyss of debt. In fact, the large industrial groups in the North, which had the concession for the management of public funds and contracts for the construction of major works, has led to immense speculation allied activities with the mafia and corrupt politicians. Thanks to financial dealers have been able to dramatically increase the cost of public works, whose implementation has often been subcontracted to the Mafia, the Camorra and 'Ndrangheta, which have worked to earn with inferior materials, with no attention to the safety of workers, and ultimately have also spilled toxic waste on construction sites. This alliance not only brought criminal and then the devastation of the beautiful Italian territories and the destruction of the landscape, but also to the robbery of the entire national wealth and public debt soaring.
We must remember that history has seen and fought these figures of speculators, when the Roman Republic during the second century BC the first Emperor Augustus Caesar, and then had to understand that the power of the publican was undermining the integrity of the Republic. The Publican, the dealers of the time, took advantage of the fact that the Republic was no longer able to manage public services are also huge financial companies and had the grant for the construction of public works and their maintenance, and management of public services. Their power had spread throughout the empire, to become a state within a state, were born and real companies, contractors powerful capitalist organizations that were to have immense authority in the economic and political influence beyond any measure that is in the provinces in the City, and were the cause of the collapse of the Republic (see Onorato Bucci, "The eastern provinces of the Roman Empire", pg. 260) .
This story is to understand the tragedy in a linear fashion that is hitting our country, and the powers that dominate it. The destruction of the State is taking place today at the hands of modern publican, the general contractor and waste managers, case in point is the huge robbery carried out by companies that dropped from Northern Italy and in league with the forces and illegal pest of the southern regions and using a multitude of professionals rogue managed to make a big sack of state resources with a devious and perverse legislation by themselves inspired and engineered by large law firms who can weave those systems more criminogenic milking what Zanotti Bianco called the "forgotten people" of the South and now withered breasts of the State exchequer, overwhelming even the retired postal savings deposited in the Fund deposits and loans, and chest last juicy booty to plunder.
The death sentence of Campania and the south, the pandemic unleashed by industrial poisons, and vicious laws that distort the Italian legislation turning every rule that could stop the strong powers of speculation in rules that make it fully legitimate acts already deemed illegal by the ordinary law of the State, this violence is breaking Italy destroying southern Italy, a land that for centuries has produced men of high culture and custom, who have contributed their sacrifices to the Italian Risorgimento and the formation of the unified state, and today suffers the destruction of the school and the desertification of the scientific and humanistic research, whose resources are drained from the usual strong powers under the name of instrumental technology research, all aimed at corporate profits and the robbery of private financial capital, and not for the training of scientists and technicians to help real progress.
Venuti less support and assistance of professional skills, now approved for most bands of dishonest businessmen and consultants, failed that costume moral prerogative of the middle class impoverished and pushed to the margins of social life, the last hope for the country remember is that the judiciary at all times to be a branch of the government, and that state power can remind people that it is his duty to defend the Constitution legal order together with the patriotic citizens, and that the judgments of the courts are the lintels of the popular consciousness and the depths of a lost purity and rigor. To help the judges to become aware of their role is defending the traditions Risorgimento and the unitary state against anarchy and against the constitutional misrule.
There is a forge where everything is transformed, where he architected and laws are formulated taking perverse fascist legislation on public works and making even greater violations of the fundamental laws of the State's accounts (even fascism had dared to advance on the cost of work, had not dared to charge by the dealers and the testers of the works had never dared to assign functions to the contracting dealers), there is a forge where you influence the appointment of judges most likely to be stranded processes and more inappropriate the court battles for the triumph of truth; in this breeding ground, which becomes a real Italian horde ruled by gangs that coach Pasquale Saraceno called corrupt bureaucrats, corrupt politicians, corrupt finance associated with the Mafia, Camorra and 'Ndrangheta with the help and advice from certified professionals in the system, in this breeding ground there are evil forces that are able to bury toxic waste in the piles of the historical memory of our country and to lull the conscience of scientists less combative.
With the reform of Title V of the Constitution there was a general shrinking of the national vision, a shrinking because of closures narrow, provincial, that does not allow to understand the scope of national historical events fundamental to the life of the country. In this shrunken every fundamental historical process is shrunk and reduced to the rank of that provincial and regional levels. At this time the process "Fibe-Impregilo" dealers of waste management in the Campania region, which tries to point out the rot and the ruthless wickedness of the real culprits who have programmed with the Satanic cruelty death of the garden of Europe and undermined the health of population, is a process that has the task of restoring the historical truth before the whole nation, the region was - and still is - a victim of the strong powers of northern Italy, coupled with financial capital and home Camorra mafia that history will judge and condemn you for having triggered a world war against the peaceful people who are unaware, a most terrible and cruel war of horrendous world wars that ravaged Europe. If the process of waste in Campania will close absolving the perpetrators of this terrible disaster without the emergence of such a falsification of historical truth will be occurred whose consequences will be that oppress the burden on future generations, because the pages are in this process - and remains - a tremendous historical document. If this process will end with a sentence inappropriate and vile will take a step back to the conscience of all Italian citizens and citizens from Campania, which will believed to be responsible for the health and environmental disaster and deserve separation from the rest of the country. In fact, among the serious faults of the strong powers is that of having violently erased from the memory of the Italian population and the memory of the old southern custom of the spontaneous and the city of Naples and Campania, waste collection, also described by the great German poet Goethe in his Travel in Italy. But the collection disturbed and hindered the owners of incinerators, which saw the collection as an obstacle to their profits. It will be longer and harder when the truth is removed by a court or uncertain infamy of a prescription, take the path for the citizens of Naples and southern Italy, which will be reprecipitated at the level of "forgotten people" as Zanotti White called the inhabitants of these lands while they were making a great effort to become citizens and not tenants.
This process is a great historical document that not only affects and is the focus of education of the Italian population, but also of rebirth or decide to completely destroy the memory of the Risorgimento who has engaged in an effort to drive millions men, an effort that will go forward or be driven back to back centuries. Mask the historical memory means burying the centuries humanism, the Risorgimento and the unitary state, covering new ground made of deadly toxic waste, the same toxic waste that now cover the fertile Italian countryside.
Due to the enormous historical significance of this process is the entire judiciary to take upon themselves an enormous responsibility, the responsibility for the choice of either defending Italy by criminal forces who want to destroy or hand over the country in their hands . We are to continue to support the judiciary, in which we place our trust, and remember every moment that this process has immense value for the training and the historical consciousness of the younger generation, and that is why the free press has to deal with of these great historical processes with firmness and courage, spirit of truth and responsibility, so that public opinion is free, mature and aware can really participate in the life of the country and support the people and magistrates everywhere struggle for its salvation. If
in this great process, the truth will be hidden by a cowardly decision, and if the people and law-abiding citizens will lose their historical consciousness, will be reset every achievement and every effort of the Italian Renaissance to create the unity of the state and the growth in civilian populations , it will trigger fights among the regions on the territory of general anarchy, and Italy will become a mere geographical expression.
Assizes of the city of Naples and Southern Italy 
The recent rediscovery of the disaster of the ship - filled with tens of thousands of drums of toxic and radioactive waste from Northern Italy and the major industrialized countries of 'Europe and America - sunk in various parts off the Italian peninsula and especially off the coast of Calabria has confirmed that the South of Italy and the Mediterranean have been sentenced to become the center of the spillage of a large part of industrial poisons. After decades, to the tenacious work of the judiciary, are finally emerging the real responsibility of the great western industries that, by using alliances with ruthless gangs and deviant devices of the state, accumulated toxic waste in the Italian ports of industrial processes and referred them to the countries of ' Africa. When they could not in their intent, these death squads were forced to return to Italy the ships loaded with poison that ended up being sunk off the coast of our country, while the criminal powers even cashed the insurance premium of sunken ships . Thanks to the ongoing work of judges and journalists are slowly emerging truths about the death of journalist Ilaria Alpi, killed in Somalia for the discovery of the traffic of toxic waste from Italy.
But the Mediterranean is not the only route flown by the traffickers of waste: thousands of trucks packed with poisons people each day through the streets of Italy, ending their run in their villainous most fertile lands, in what was once called Campania felix the fruitfulness of his land, and deep valleys of Calabria. With those wastes have been poisoned in the hills, valleys, fields and waters around the south, and built the walls of the houses of citizens from Caserta in Crotone die every day, quietly, of horrible evils that never until now had so widely affected this area.
The strong powers of northern Italy have betrayed their mission was to produce industrial goods and services of general interest, and blinded by the profit they have made a pact of steel with the Mafia, Camorra and 'Ndrangheta, for the illegal disposal regions South of toxic waste from their industries and from major industries in western countries.
The President of the Republic, the Hon. Giorgio Napolitano, has confirmed that the traffic of toxic waste comes from northern Italy with a goal in the South. [Insert newspaper quote] In this way the great powers have not only facilitated the formation of financial capital of the thighs mafia, but subject to a ruthless exploitation of the south, rifeudalizzandolo for their purposes.
addition, the strong powers of big business in northern Italy, betraying the cause of the Risorgimento and Italian unity, were associated with the mafia in the perverse and criminal activities of private management of concessions of public procurement, an intermediary financial the great economist Pasquale Saraceno called the true cause of the abyss of debt. In fact, the large industrial groups in the North, which had the concession for the management of public funds and contracts for the construction of major works, has led to immense speculation allied activities with the mafia and corrupt politicians. Thanks to financial dealers have been able to dramatically increase the cost of public works, whose implementation has often been subcontracted to the Mafia, the Camorra and 'Ndrangheta, which have worked to earn with inferior materials, with no attention to the safety of workers, and ultimately have also spilled toxic waste on construction sites. This alliance not only brought criminal and then the devastation of the beautiful Italian territories and the destruction of the landscape, but also to the robbery of the entire national wealth and public debt soaring.
We must remember that history has seen and fought these figures of speculators, when the Roman Republic during the second century BC the first Emperor Augustus Caesar, and then had to understand that the power of the publican was undermining the integrity of the Republic. The Publican, the dealers of the time, took advantage of the fact that the Republic was no longer able to manage public services are also huge financial companies and had the grant for the construction of public works and their maintenance, and management of public services. Their power had spread throughout the empire, to become a state within a state, were born and real companies, contractors powerful capitalist organizations that were to have immense authority in the economic and political influence beyond any measure that is in the provinces in the City, and were the cause of the collapse of the Republic (see Onorato Bucci, "The eastern provinces of the Roman Empire", pg. 260) .
This story is to understand the tragedy in a linear fashion that is hitting our country, and the powers that dominate it. The destruction of the State is taking place today at the hands of modern publican, the general contractor and waste managers, case in point is the huge robbery carried out by companies that dropped from Northern Italy and in league with the forces and illegal pest of the southern regions and using a multitude of professionals rogue managed to make a big sack of state resources with a devious and perverse legislation by themselves inspired and engineered by large law firms who can weave those systems more criminogenic milking what Zanotti Bianco called the "forgotten people" of the South and now withered breasts of the State exchequer, overwhelming even the retired postal savings deposited in the Fund deposits and loans, and chest last juicy booty to plunder.
The death sentence of Campania and the south, the pandemic unleashed by industrial poisons, and vicious laws that distort the Italian legislation turning every rule that could stop the strong powers of speculation in rules that make it fully legitimate acts already deemed illegal by the ordinary law of the State, this violence is breaking Italy destroying southern Italy, a land that for centuries has produced men of high culture and custom, who have contributed their sacrifices to the Italian Risorgimento and the formation of the unified state, and today suffers the destruction of the school and the desertification of the scientific and humanistic research, whose resources are drained from the usual strong powers under the name of instrumental technology research, all aimed at corporate profits and the robbery of private financial capital, and not for the training of scientists and technicians to help real progress.
Venuti less support and assistance of professional skills, now approved for most bands of dishonest businessmen and consultants, failed that costume moral prerogative of the middle class impoverished and pushed to the margins of social life, the last hope for the country remember is that the judiciary at all times to be a branch of the government, and that state power can remind people that it is his duty to defend the Constitution legal order together with the patriotic citizens, and that the judgments of the courts are the lintels of the popular consciousness and the depths of a lost purity and rigor. To help the judges to become aware of their role is defending the traditions Risorgimento and the unitary state against anarchy and against the constitutional misrule.
There is a forge where everything is transformed, where he architected and laws are formulated taking perverse fascist legislation on public works and making even greater violations of the fundamental laws of the State's accounts (even fascism had dared to advance on the cost of work, had not dared to charge by the dealers and the testers of the works had never dared to assign functions to the contracting dealers), there is a forge where you influence the appointment of judges most likely to be stranded processes and more inappropriate the court battles for the triumph of truth; in this breeding ground, which becomes a real Italian horde ruled by gangs that coach Pasquale Saraceno called corrupt bureaucrats, corrupt politicians, corrupt finance associated with the Mafia, Camorra and 'Ndrangheta with the help and advice from certified professionals in the system, in this breeding ground there are evil forces that are able to bury toxic waste in the piles of the historical memory of our country and to lull the conscience of scientists less combative.
With the reform of Title V of the Constitution there was a general shrinking of the national vision, a shrinking because of closures narrow, provincial, that does not allow to understand the scope of national historical events fundamental to the life of the country. In this shrunken every fundamental historical process is shrunk and reduced to the rank of that provincial and regional levels. At this time the process "Fibe-Impregilo" dealers of waste management in the Campania region, which tries to point out the rot and the ruthless wickedness of the real culprits who have programmed with the Satanic cruelty death of the garden of Europe and undermined the health of population, is a process that has the task of restoring the historical truth before the whole nation, the region was - and still is - a victim of the strong powers of northern Italy, coupled with financial capital and home Camorra mafia that history will judge and condemn you for having triggered a world war against the peaceful people who are unaware, a most terrible and cruel war of horrendous world wars that ravaged Europe. If the process of waste in Campania will close absolving the perpetrators of this terrible disaster without the emergence of such a falsification of historical truth will be occurred whose consequences will be that oppress the burden on future generations, because the pages are in this process - and remains - a tremendous historical document. If this process will end with a sentence inappropriate and vile will take a step back to the conscience of all Italian citizens and citizens from Campania, which will believed to be responsible for the health and environmental disaster and deserve separation from the rest of the country. In fact, among the serious faults of the strong powers is that of having violently erased from the memory of the Italian population and the memory of the old southern custom of the spontaneous and the city of Naples and Campania, waste collection, also described by the great German poet Goethe in his Travel in Italy. But the collection disturbed and hindered the owners of incinerators, which saw the collection as an obstacle to their profits. It will be longer and harder when the truth is removed by a court or uncertain infamy of a prescription, take the path for the citizens of Naples and southern Italy, which will be reprecipitated at the level of "forgotten people" as Zanotti White called the inhabitants of these lands while they were making a great effort to become citizens and not tenants.
This process is a great historical document that not only affects and is the focus of education of the Italian population, but also of rebirth or decide to completely destroy the memory of the Risorgimento who has engaged in an effort to drive millions men, an effort that will go forward or be driven back to back centuries. Mask the historical memory means burying the centuries humanism, the Risorgimento and the unitary state, covering new ground made of deadly toxic waste, the same toxic waste that now cover the fertile Italian countryside.
Due to the enormous historical significance of this process is the entire judiciary to take upon themselves an enormous responsibility, the responsibility for the choice of either defending Italy by criminal forces who want to destroy or hand over the country in their hands . We are to continue to support the judiciary, in which we place our trust, and remember every moment that this process has immense value for the training and the historical consciousness of the younger generation, and that is why the free press has to deal with of these great historical processes with firmness and courage, spirit of truth and responsibility, so that public opinion is free, mature and aware can really participate in the life of the country and support the people and magistrates everywhere struggle for its salvation. If
in this great process, the truth will be hidden by a cowardly decision, and if the people and law-abiding citizens will lose their historical consciousness, will be reset every achievement and every effort of the Italian Renaissance to create the unity of the state and the growth in civilian populations , it will trigger fights among the regions on the territory of general anarchy, and Italy will become a mere geographical expression.
Assizes of the city of Naples and Southern Italy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)