do not move
small and careful steps gold.
- Materials: high density polyethylene, paper and cloth
- Size: Size 44
- Year: 2009
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Back Pain Above Waist On Right
do not move
small and careful steps gold.
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Lumps On Stomach Puss
privatized. The risks The choice of a reform of the leopard
There are few reports in the newspapers and no TV in the privatization of water. Yet in these days you decide our future. There is discussion in the Senate because the new law makes no public management of water. It is not only our dilemma. Many countries around the world are wondering, the press and on television, until the pun is permissible to privatize a public good, that everyone should have shaft. The fact is that the water is about to become the gold in the future there are those who think to make money on it. Hence the rush to grab a few large multinationals are the rights granted.
I have already written on the subject. And there are those who I replied that my concerns are exaggerated because the properties of the sources and networks will still be public even though the supply to private firms. But the right to water is expressed only when and if it flows from the tap is drinkable. The city does not go with the bucket at the well or other source or line up to the water. The right to drinking water is exercised only through the management and delivery.
In most of Europe, moreover, the privatization has been stopped or even, as happens in France, is undergoing a process of ripubblicizzazione. Switzerland has declared the water and water systems State monopoly, is not open to privatization. Belgium has made a law to which all the valves are operated by spa in-house, or whose shares are all in the hands of the Co muni. The United States refuses to privatize the management of local water systems that remain solid in the hands of municipalities. Throughout Latin America and then act in a large laboratory on the commons. In Uruguay, Bolivia, Ecuador and now in Chile parliaments would also change the Constitutions to enforce those principles. Remember that in Chile, the privatization took place only Pinochet came to power. Today, the Chilean government is returning to public ownership.
Why so worried about the private management water? The fact is that when a good pass so important in private hands, the first consequence is the diminution of its controls, the second is that higher prices (as happened in Latin America where the transfer to the multinational Veolia have led to increased rates 300%) and often also squeezes the hand of organized crime (something that happened in Sicily and Calabria).
The league that was opposed to privatization, most recently he changed his mind. Why? Lease-signing today a bill that proposes Calderoli even to get to 30% participation of the municipalities party to the management companies already listed. Senators and MPs ask that reflect before approving a law that will enrich the large private companies (those most favored today are foreign) and impoverish our government.
Dacia Maraini, "Corriere della Sera, November 3, 2009 
There are few reports in the newspapers and no TV in the privatization of water. Yet in these days you decide our future. There is discussion in the Senate because the new law makes no public management of water. It is not only our dilemma. Many countries around the world are wondering, the press and on television, until the pun is permissible to privatize a public good, that everyone should have shaft. The fact is that the water is about to become the gold in the future there are those who think to make money on it. Hence the rush to grab a few large multinationals are the rights granted.
I have already written on the subject. And there are those who I replied that my concerns are exaggerated because the properties of the sources and networks will still be public even though the supply to private firms. But the right to water is expressed only when and if it flows from the tap is drinkable. The city does not go with the bucket at the well or other source or line up to the water. The right to drinking water is exercised only through the management and delivery.
In most of Europe, moreover, the privatization has been stopped or even, as happens in France, is undergoing a process of ripubblicizzazione. Switzerland has declared the water and water systems State monopoly, is not open to privatization. Belgium has made a law to which all the valves are operated by spa in-house, or whose shares are all in the hands of the Co muni. The United States refuses to privatize the management of local water systems that remain solid in the hands of municipalities. Throughout Latin America and then act in a large laboratory on the commons. In Uruguay, Bolivia, Ecuador and now in Chile parliaments would also change the Constitutions to enforce those principles. Remember that in Chile, the privatization took place only Pinochet came to power. Today, the Chilean government is returning to public ownership.
Why so worried about the private management water? The fact is that when a good pass so important in private hands, the first consequence is the diminution of its controls, the second is that higher prices (as happened in Latin America where the transfer to the multinational Veolia have led to increased rates 300%) and often also squeezes the hand of organized crime (something that happened in Sicily and Calabria).
The league that was opposed to privatization, most recently he changed his mind. Why? Lease-signing today a bill that proposes Calderoli even to get to 30% participation of the municipalities party to the management companies already listed. Senators and MPs ask that reflect before approving a law that will enrich the large private companies (those most favored today are foreign) and impoverish our government.
Dacia Maraini, "Corriere della Sera, November 3, 2009
Persuasive Essay On Cameras In Schools
The classical idea of \u200b\u200buniversities, now seen at sunset, revolves around the principle of freedom of research and certain corollaries: that neither the political nor private interests interfere in research and education of students, that only scientists judge the scientists, and universities are also accountable to society for the way he uses his freedom.
This is the spirit that reigns in a real university. The role that students play traditional social and political opposition (from May 68 until the Tehran of today) up to the vagaries in the field of clothing and lifestyle of the teachers, academic freedom is a luxury that a democratic and developed society should readily provide forward-looking, recognizing the positive effects. Whether it's algorithms, or discoveries, literary or legal interpretations, new treatments and new technologies, what the university produces freely back in the form of value added knowledge, civil and cultural society which has made it possible.
The privilege has naturally academic counterparts. The teachers must earn their position, which means that only their skills and productivity (to be determined on the basis of what they do, according to evaluation criteria inevitably conventional, but applied universally) justify their position, they are accountable to the community rather than what they seek, but the money they spend in research and, above all, have a duty to make public and transparent criteria and procedures used by those who promote or co-opt them one day replace.
In other words, the university may be free only if it is responsible. On this level, sorry to say, not only the governments of the center-right and center the last two decades have proved disastrous, but the class has given its academic contribution to effective disaster. I'll make an example of connivance objective. Even stones know by now that the reform failed because Berlinguer imposed by academic lobbies that have found an ideal mechanism to multiply places and powers. Beyond the purely verbal protests of the Conference of rectors to the incessant cutting of funds between the governments of recent years and large groups of academic power has always been a match for amorous feelings.
But the connivance between barons and ministers go further. After the appearance of free tracks and effects of incompetent people as Moratti and Mussi, the minister Gelmini - University of questions that probably do not chew much, but it must have consultants who have very clear objectives - gives further interventionist steering not only by imposing all universities the same structure of government, while dramatically increasing the power of the rector are empowered to elect the "full professors employed by Italian universities have proven expertise and management experience, including at international level, in higher education, research or cultural institutions" (Article 2, paragraph 2, Section c ). In other words, only a small group of barons will elect the rector, and because of that count under the rectors are doctors and engineers, anyone who understands what the interest groups, academic and otherwise, involved in the actual governance of the university.
In accordance with the principles of freedom and responsibility set out above, some points of the bill are totally unacceptable, while others, on paper, could be discussed. Among the first is the forty per cent of seats in the Board of Directors reserved for "private", with no constraint of funding (with the private law that contribute to decisions on academic life do not give contributions?). And the same goes for an independent assessment by the contours indefinable, but visibly open to individuals and subject to the empire of the minister. Not to mention the rules on recruitment. Beyond the 'rating' of the national student teachers, which incorporates ideas as old as the world and at the bottom of the ancient university teaching, the composition of committees is obviously cumbersome, as always, and is based on a principle, the draw, replacing in part the mere chance to the old national divisions. In scientific areas organized, namely those who have real power, it is easy to predict that the draw will not change things much.
The principle of the evaluation of individual research in principle is sacrosanct and can not understand why so many encounters resistance on the left (or better you understand very well). Who is old craft known that the Italian university carries at each hierarchical level, a pocket of teachers who, if they have done research on young people, at some point they stop or vivacchiano, making your own business or an interest only their micropowers. That taxpayers pay the salary similar to "teachers" - and there are many - who are employed plus that could be reserved for young people is a disgrace the Italian university. And I do not find anything scandalous in the fact that they are no incentives for the most deserving, those who work harder and better. Rather, what is lacking is the sense that the incentive funds are managed by the Minister of Economy: This just means that the minister will dictate to the academic evaluation criteria that will be anything but scientific. As for the fact that these funds will be derived (in words) from the proceeds of the infamous shield Tremonti, the equation of money and illegal financing of the science speaks for itself.
Even temporary research in theory could be acceptable (if only to test them and to avoid entering a university and his work is not valued anymore). But since we are in Italy and "reform" is at no cost, it is clear that fixed-term contracts are only a precarious again, plus with no indication on future openings.
seems to me that the Bill Gelmini manipulate more or less skillfully diventati.nel some principles that are good and bad common sense University (evaluation, merit, efficiency, etc...) But I have the impression that its purpose is primarily to strengthen the Italian university in top-down way, by giving all power to the alliance between rulers, baronial groups and external actors. In fact, the bill control over what teachers actually do is completely random and smoky, the assessment is a chimera and the simplification of structures in the service of a more despotic than before but as bureaucratic in the past.
Taking into account that the funds have steadily declined and that the structural defects are not scratched in any way, the result of the bill will be a university Gelmini culturally modest, much less competitive on the international stage and subject to political power. In short, a reform but gattopardesca bombastic style of the Italian right, so everything is like before or maybe worse.
Alessandro Dal Lago, "the manifesto," November 6, 2009
Washing Machine Drain To Septic
A guilty silence
Posters have begun to pick up the stories of the routes of poisons September 5, 2009, in a report on the landfill Borgo Montello, in the province of Latina . This area not far from Rome, where according to some employees of the Justice Casale have buried hazardous waste for years, has a vocation for agriculture. It's like a garden where they grow vegetables, fruits, wine grapes. A few months ago Lazio ARPA (Regional Agency for Environmental Protection), wrote that the groundwater is contaminated. Well, the suspicion was - and is - that there are over a part of drums of hazardous wastes transported in the late 80's by some ships of poisons.
The discovery yesterday of a container at the bottom of the Tuscan sea adds another piece to our reconstruction. And, if it is found that the waste is toxic, it would be a demonstration of what we're trying to prove 'the case' does not stop at the wreck of Cetraro and one we are taking is not just a story of the past, but a simpleton that continues today.
toxic
The routing system has been used by at least 140 "major brands", that the elite of the Italian industrial system, as we have reported and documented in recent days. And the same network collusion, aiding and abetting criminals, alongside parts of the state where we are now seeing the worst mafia - the Camorra and 'Ndrangheta - was then enlarged and specialized in recent years. There are at least five questions that await an answer. The Chronicles
talk about the latest allied industries Enea fixer as Flavio Carboni to handle alleged trafficking of asbestos (inquiry into landfill Pomezia, 2009), we have assisted in the management of huge landfills Biutiful cauntri of Casale, we wrote of how large companies all burned in incinerators without any control. These are pieces of the same story, which continues the '80s, when the Italian ships carried around the world waste of our industries.
For this we will continue to speak on these pages vessels of poisons. There are questions for months waiting for a response from the government. Pieces of a single disaster still shrouded by a dense network of political and institutional reluctance. The list, hoping that one day someone will manage to unravel the tangle and give some answers. Here they are.
1) - On September 5, we asked the Civil Defence to know where they were disposed of 10,500 toxic drums from the ship Zanoobia reported in Italy in May 1988. Civil protection so far not been able to respond. We therefore ask the Minister for the Environment: the government is able to explain how and where they were disposed of hazardous toxic waste back to Italy between 1988 and 1989?
2) - Minister Carlo Giovanardi said in Parliament in 2004: "Obvious warning signs are caught in some legal proceedings which showed a clear overlap between these activities and illegal arms trafficking. (...) Several factors show that the involvement in the trafficking of institutional and non-European governments. " What are those countries who have been involved in international traffic of waste?
3) - On 24 January 2006, the then deputy public prosecutor Francesco di Paola told Greek before the bicameral committee on waste which was found off a wreck Cetraro length of 126 meters. Following further information received by the Prosecutor Paola Giordano Bruno, the regional minister of the Greek Calabria Silvio wrote May 14, 2009 to Environment Minister asking for action to the study of the wreck. Because in the nearly four years the Ministry of Environment has never detailed what was communicated by the Prosecutor Paolo since January 2006?
4) - In the same session in January 2006, the Greek public prosecutor said that Francis was not able to obtain precise information from the Coast Guard on wrecks off Cetraro and in some cases had been opposed by the military secret. It appears to Minister that there is a state secret or military wrecks on the seabed of Calabria? E 'was never placed on the secret story of the ships of poisons? It 's true that the Coast Guard did not provide the information requested by the prosecutor in Paola, as claimed by the magistrate Francesco Greek?
5) - In May 2007, an entrepreneur of Fondi (Latina), Massimo Di Fazio Anastasio, then arrested on charges of Mafia-like manner wear, announced that it had entered into an agreement with Liberia for the export of waste Africa worth 170 million euro. According to the website of the local channel seven, the agreement also participated in the ex-mayor Luigi Parisella. Today then we report the story of containers thrown into the sea by German ships, only four months ago. It is the environment minister that there are now agreements for the export of hazardous waste by Italian companies to Africa? What control procedures of our seas are being implemented to stop the discharge of waste from commercial vessels?
the preparation of "the manifesto," November 5, 2009 
Posters have begun to pick up the stories of the routes of poisons September 5, 2009, in a report on the landfill Borgo Montello, in the province of Latina . This area not far from Rome, where according to some employees of the Justice Casale have buried hazardous waste for years, has a vocation for agriculture. It's like a garden where they grow vegetables, fruits, wine grapes. A few months ago Lazio ARPA (Regional Agency for Environmental Protection), wrote that the groundwater is contaminated. Well, the suspicion was - and is - that there are over a part of drums of hazardous wastes transported in the late 80's by some ships of poisons.
The discovery yesterday of a container at the bottom of the Tuscan sea adds another piece to our reconstruction. And, if it is found that the waste is toxic, it would be a demonstration of what we're trying to prove 'the case' does not stop at the wreck of Cetraro and one we are taking is not just a story of the past, but a simpleton that continues today.
toxic
The routing system has been used by at least 140 "major brands", that the elite of the Italian industrial system, as we have reported and documented in recent days. And the same network collusion, aiding and abetting criminals, alongside parts of the state where we are now seeing the worst mafia - the Camorra and 'Ndrangheta - was then enlarged and specialized in recent years. There are at least five questions that await an answer. The Chronicles
talk about the latest allied industries Enea fixer as Flavio Carboni to handle alleged trafficking of asbestos (inquiry into landfill Pomezia, 2009), we have assisted in the management of huge landfills Biutiful cauntri of Casale, we wrote of how large companies all burned in incinerators without any control. These are pieces of the same story, which continues the '80s, when the Italian ships carried around the world waste of our industries.
For this we will continue to speak on these pages vessels of poisons. There are questions for months waiting for a response from the government. Pieces of a single disaster still shrouded by a dense network of political and institutional reluctance. The list, hoping that one day someone will manage to unravel the tangle and give some answers. Here they are.
1) - On September 5, we asked the Civil Defence to know where they were disposed of 10,500 toxic drums from the ship Zanoobia reported in Italy in May 1988. Civil protection so far not been able to respond. We therefore ask the Minister for the Environment: the government is able to explain how and where they were disposed of hazardous toxic waste back to Italy between 1988 and 1989?
2) - Minister Carlo Giovanardi said in Parliament in 2004: "Obvious warning signs are caught in some legal proceedings which showed a clear overlap between these activities and illegal arms trafficking. (...) Several factors show that the involvement in the trafficking of institutional and non-European governments. " What are those countries who have been involved in international traffic of waste?
3) - On 24 January 2006, the then deputy public prosecutor Francesco di Paola told Greek before the bicameral committee on waste which was found off a wreck Cetraro length of 126 meters. Following further information received by the Prosecutor Paola Giordano Bruno, the regional minister of the Greek Calabria Silvio wrote May 14, 2009 to Environment Minister asking for action to the study of the wreck. Because in the nearly four years the Ministry of Environment has never detailed what was communicated by the Prosecutor Paolo since January 2006?
4) - In the same session in January 2006, the Greek public prosecutor said that Francis was not able to obtain precise information from the Coast Guard on wrecks off Cetraro and in some cases had been opposed by the military secret. It appears to Minister that there is a state secret or military wrecks on the seabed of Calabria? E 'was never placed on the secret story of the ships of poisons? It 's true that the Coast Guard did not provide the information requested by the prosecutor in Paola, as claimed by the magistrate Francesco Greek?
5) - In May 2007, an entrepreneur of Fondi (Latina), Massimo Di Fazio Anastasio, then arrested on charges of Mafia-like manner wear, announced that it had entered into an agreement with Liberia for the export of waste Africa worth 170 million euro. According to the website of the local channel seven, the agreement also participated in the ex-mayor Luigi Parisella. Today then we report the story of containers thrown into the sea by German ships, only four months ago. It is the environment minister that there are now agreements for the export of hazardous waste by Italian companies to Africa? What control procedures of our seas are being implemented to stop the discharge of waste from commercial vessels?
the preparation of "the manifesto," November 5, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)